Post your Internet Browser Benchmark part 6

wds7

[QUOTE=Maxxwire;1179601]wds7- Your laptop's Peacekeeper score for Chrome is not bad. My HP laptop's Opera score on Peacekeeper is about 3,200, but the desktop scores over 11,000.

~Maxx~

Cool ....Thanks Maxx .
i thought ..it's pretty fast ..compare to IE8 ...

Chiumiento

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Maxxwire

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Chiumiento

Why does it matter what zoom percentage you are at when you run the Peace keeper?

It wouldn't as long as you disclose the zoom percentage of your results when you present your Peacekeeper benchmark so that others will know how much it has been inflated.

~Maxx~

Yes but how does it inflate it. Does it make it easier because it only has to load less stuff. Because there is less to fit on the page so means less to be loaded?

Maxxwire

I really wouldn't know nor does it matter to me. All Peacekeeper benchtests are relative to one another if they are done in the same way so I just do them at the full screen standard because I use Opera full screen and I'm not interested in inflated results about its performance.

~Maxx~

stve

Now that Firefox beta 9 is out I tested again.
Initial impressions of beta 9 are positive its quick loading pages & will probably take over from Chrome as my backup browser.

wds7

�� Quote: Originally Posted by stve

Now that Firefox beta 9 is out I tested again.
Initial impressions of beta 9 are positive its quick loading pages & will probably take over from Chrome as my backup browser.

Oh ..man ...So tempting ...But in my world ...don't like the word "beta" ...
I'll wait for the real one then i test ..
Ok with Chrome for now ..

GeneO

pre beta10

kurahk7

Here's my scores....the Chrome 8.0.552.344 is my CR-48.

Dave76

That CR-48 score is a little disappointing

kurahk7

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Dave76

That CR-48 score is a little disappointing

I wonder what a Windows 7 based netbook with the same specs, Atom 1.6ghz HT, 2gb ram, 16 gb ssd, would get with chrome.

FirewaveZ

My scores seem a bit low to me. What do you think?

Mercurial

wow, my topic has grown LOL! I need some rep yo~! XD (I'm kidding, thats against the rules don't bann me -_-

heres my latest with the two fastest browsers



I prefer chrome, because I like the UI, im kinda used to it now lol.

but I'm surprised that opera is really fast O_O; it just needs more GPU performance and awesome addons and thats it!

Safari is almost like GChrome XD. Its just the branding Apple - Google

I wish I could give the people here a link of the site im currently developing so they can visually see Firefox javascript performance vs Chrome,Opera,Safari(Firefox gets its butt kicked) :P but its highly classified lol

kurahk7

Here's my WebVizBench results.

kurahk7

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Mercurial

wow, my topic has grown LOL! I need some rep yo~! XD (I'm kidding, thats against the rules don't bann me -_-

heres my latest with the two fastest browsers



I prefer chrome, because I like the UI, im kinda used to it now lol.

but I'm surprised that opera is really fast O_O; it just needs more GPU performance and awesome addons and thats it!

Safari is almost like GChrome XD. Its just the branding Apple - Google

I wish I could give the people here a link of the site im currently developing so they can visually see Firefox javascript performance vs Chrome,Opera,Safari(Firefox gets its butt kicked) :P but its highly classified lol

I see that your Opera is 10.63, Opera 11 has been released quite a while ago and brings some noticeable performance improvements so it should perform even better.

imeem

Is it just me or that the silverlight plug in for chrome usually crashes when watching videos like on MSN Videos?

Maxxwire

Opera wins! Google Chrome is right behind though.

Mercurial

Opera wins! Google Chrome is right behind though. [/QUOTE]

Go Acer Aspire One!

~Maxx~

stve

But Chrome still wins JavaScript execution performance though :P!

imeem

Tested the latest from Chromium & Opera
Opera 11.01 build 1179 the latest builds have been about stability rather than performance.
Chromium 10.0.649.0 is getting close.

stve

ChromePlus (8.0.552.224) vs. latest version of Chrome.

Guest

Included 2 browsers from 2007 that i downloaded from Old Apps.
They are pretty slooow in the benchmark but browsing the net they both feel snappy on most sites.

oreo27

Here's mine. I'm actually using Pale Moon, not Firefox. Also, this is the office Desktop. I'll try it again later at my house

The Pale Moon Project homepage

Subsonic

�� Quote: Originally Posted by oreo27

Here's mine. I'm actually using Pale Moon, not Firefox. Also, this is the office Desktop. I'll try it again later at my house

The Pale Moon Project homepage

Hi Oreo27,

Had never heard of Pale Moon before. Pretty nice. Thanks for posting!

oreo27

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Subsonic

�� Quote: Originally Posted by oreo27

Here's mine. I'm actually using Pale Moon, not Firefox. Also, this is the office Desktop. I'll try it again later at my house

The Pale Moon Project homepage

Hi Oreo27,

Had never heard of Pale Moon before. Pretty nice. Thanks for posting!

It's indeed great mate. Just a bit of better performance from Firefox. I discovered it from a member in the Forums I moderate in.

This reminds me, I still have yet to do a benchmark at home

architect

hi,
here are my scores, not knowing what they exactly mean....
i only know, that chrome 10 is very fast in my opinion...

oreo27

Well, as an update. I'm posting three browsers.

Firefox 3.6.13, again is not Firefox, It is Pale Moon. Chrome owned in this benchmark but I still prefer Pale Moon.

Gornot

Subjectively speaking, this is a colossal improvement, even when compared to the official beta:



IE 9.0.8073.6003

snit3

Win 7-64 Pro, just installed IE-9

wds7

From Chrome 8 = 3500 ..to chrome 9 ....: Much faster ....;

snit3

Just installed Chrome on this machine alongside IE-9. Interesting comparison!

imeem

Chrome 9 vs. Chrome 8.

Chrome 8 won the first 3 test and Chrome 9 won the last 3 test.

OCing my video card barely did anything to the score.

stve

Quote:

imeem : OCing my video card barely did anything to the score.

From the Peacekeeper FAQ

Quote:

What factors affect the score?

Other than the browser itself, the most significant factor affecting the score is the type of CPU in your PC. After that, the power of your graphics card affects the result somewhat, though mostly in situations where the card is very slow, or no drivers have been installed for it. Running other applications that consume system resources at the same time as the benchmark is running will naturally affect the score. The size of the viewable browser area also affects the score, so the screen resolution you use, the size of the browser window and whether the window is minimized affect the score as well. Beyond these, other factors are usually not significant. Your internet connection speed and network latency do not influence the score in any way.

Gornot

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Gornot

Subjectively speaking, this is a colossal improvement, even when compared to the official beta:

Attachment 136676

IE 9.0.8073.6003

Update: And here's the RC

valdir

�� Quote: Originally Posted by oreo27

Here's mine. I'm actually using Pale Moon, not Firefox. Also, this is the office Desktop. I'll try it again later at my house

The Pale Moon Project homepage

Thanks for the link ... looking at Pale Moon

Chiumiento

Hi, here's my IE9 RC score, I think it's OK

Chiumiento

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Ciara

�� Quote: Originally Posted by oreo27

Here's mine. I'm actually using Pale Moon, not Firefox. Also, this is the office Desktop. I'll try it again later at my house

The Pale Moon Project homepage

Thanks for the link ... looking at Pale Moon

I want to see a benchmark for this browser.

GeneO

The one that says firefox is actually A browser called Pale Moon. It is based on firefox but supposed to be faster.

Lava King

Anybody have the IE9 RC compared to the latest Frirefox beta (beta 11 or pre12) on the same system?

stve

Hmm...I'm unable to get to Peacekeeper or any FutureMark page.


Not trying to muddy the waters or anything, but this thread made me curious so I searched for some alternatives.
Sunspider 0.9.1 goes through its tests rather quickly so I ran it on several different machines using different browsers with startling results.

Test scores are in milliseconds, lower numbers are better.

This machine:
Core 2 Duo E8500 3.1 GHz
4 GB Ram
BFG 9800 GT OC graphics
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit
WD Scorpio Black 1 TB hdd
IE8 score: 3673.2 ms
Chrome: 222.1 ms

Apple MacBook Pro 2010
Core i5 2.4 GHz
4 GB Ram
GT 330 graphics
Mac OSX 10.6.6
Safari: 315.0 ms
Firefox: 799.7 ms

Toshiba Satellite A305-S6848
AMD Turion TL-60 2.0 GHz
3 GB Ram
ATI x1300 graphics
Windows 7 Home Premium 32-bit
IE8: 8732.5 ms
Chrome: 491.4 ms

AMD Athlon x2 4000+
2 GB ram
ATI on-board graphics
Ubuntu 10.04
Firefox: 1724.1 ms

So, what does all this mean? Probably not much in the grand scheme of things. I'll keep trying Peacekeeper and post back when it becomes available.

Kent

oreo27

IE 9 RC is not completing Peacekeeper its getting hung up on the string section.

The Sunspider benchmark is not very useful anymore all the more recent modern browsers are very fast.

The fastest on my PC is
IE 9 133 ms
Firefox Beta 11 162 ms
Opera 11.01 166 ms
Google Chrome 11.0.667.0 canary build,,,,173 ms

In all the other benchmark tests I've run V8 Benchmark
Mozilla Kraken & Dromeo IE 9 is the slowest.

Did Internet Explorer 9 Cheat In The SunSpider Benchmark?

Guest

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Ciara

�� Quote: Originally Posted by oreo27

Here's mine. I'm actually using Pale Moon, not Firefox. Also, this is the office Desktop. I'll try it again later at my house

The Pale Moon Project homepage

Thanks for the link ... looking at Pale Moon

Sure

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Chiumiento

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Ciara

�� Quote: Originally Posted by oreo27

Here's mine. I'm actually using Pale Moon, not Firefox. Also, this is the office Desktop. I'll try it again later at my house

The Pale Moon Project homepage

Thanks for the link ... looking at Pale Moon

I want to see a benchmark for this browser.

Here's the benchmark mate. Firefox is actually Pale Moon. I don't have one compared to Firefox itself though.

�� Quote: Originally Posted by oreo27

Well, as an update. I'm posting three browsers.



Firefox 3.6.13, again is not Firefox, It is Pale Moon. Chrome owned in this benchmark but I still prefer Pale Moon.

Chiumiento

�� Quote: Originally Posted by oreo27

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Ciara

�� Quote: Originally Posted by oreo27

Here's mine. I'm actually using Pale Moon, not Firefox. Also, this is the office Desktop. I'll try it again later at my house

The Pale Moon Project homepage

Thanks for the link ... looking at Pale Moon

Sure

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Chiumiento

I want to see a benchmark for this browser.

Here's the benchmark mate. Firefox is actually Pale Moon. I don't have one compared to Firefox itself though.

�� Quote: Originally Posted by oreo27

Well, as an update. I'm posting three browsers.



Firefox 3.6.13, again is not Firefox, It is Pale Moon. Chrome owned in this benchmark but I still prefer Pale Moon.

I actually have already benchmarked it myself a couple posts before this one. I really did not see much significance to keep it.

Unknown ID

Hiks Iam open 10 Tabs in same Time



Here you can check my Result in here

Chiumiento

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Unknown ID

Hiks Iam open 10 Tabs in same Time



Here you can check my Result in here

Did you do your benchmark with 10 tabs open? I am not sure. But I think that would drastically lower your benchmark scores. I do not think I have even seen a chrome benchmark that low before. Though I have not seen them all. I am sure there is a few. But That is lower than IE9 was on my system. I do not have a very good system either.

snit3

I thought it would be interesting to fire up an old (el cheepo) e-machine and take the browser test as I update from IE7 to IE8, then Chrome. This is a T1840 e-machine using Win XP, SP3. Comes stock with a Celeron 1.8 GHz processor, 40 GB HD, 128 MB RAM, and 48 MB (whew!) of ON BOARD AGP mem. I did the tests using one of my 22" Sceptre monitors at 1600 x 900 resolution and 32 bit color just to "strain" the stock system.

The IE-7 test results are (as suspected) super lousy. I didn't bother with screen shots for a couple of reasons. Anyway, here are the numbers:

IE-7 (7.0.5730.11) tested at 107 (about the slowest I've seen on this thread)
IE-8 (8.0.6001.18702) tested at 157
Chrome (9.0.597.98) tested at 1753 WOW!

If you want a way to speed up surfing (noticeably) on an old or cheep machine, try Chrome instead of a new graphics card. It's free, and you won't even have to pull of the cover!

Dzanan

this explains why I never use IE:

IownAmoneyPit

Chrome with multiple(6) tabs opened and with single tab

Hellriser

IE 9 RC and FF beta 11

Subsonic

Did the test on Palemoon 3.6.14

Hellriser

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Hellriser

Did the test on Palemoon 3.6.14

Here it is on Palemoon 4.0b11-MCP

Guest

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Subsonic

Here it is on Palemoon 4.0b11-MCP

OMG. That is freakin' fast! Can't wait for the official release.
Edit, just tested the current Firefox beta build - 4.0b12. Gave me a score of 4537.
Big improvement from the version 3 firefox.

Dave76

Since I haven't posted mine in a while...

stve

Tested the latest browsers with Peacekeeper & IE 9 test drive demos Maze Solver 40x40 layout.
CSS Layout Performance Test

Fastest Opera 12 seconds
Slowest Chrome 10 beta 500 seconds

Subsonic

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Hellriser

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Subsonic

Here it is on Palemoon 4.0b11-MCP

OMG. That is freakin' fast! Can't wait for the official release.
Edit, just tested the current Firefox beta build - 4.0b12. Gave me a score of 4537.
Big improvement from the version 3 firefox.

Just got hold of Firefox 4 RC. Here's what it gives:

mattburles

does someone have a benchmark between ie 9 RC and firefox 4 Rc1? Im curious whichc one does better.

Chiumiento

I think it is pretty close in some areas. But I think that Fire Fox rates better most times. But With the way that IE9 works now with the GPU rendering. I think that depending on the Graphics card someone has also makes a huge difference in IE9

Maxxwire

I tried the Palemoon 3.6.15 and tested it along with Firefox 3.6.15 before I upgraded to 4.0 RC and Palemoon was a little faster, but still far behind Minefield and Opera 11.10.

~Maxx~

imeem

Lowest score is IE9 x64.

I thought they said IE9 is the fastest web browser.

Dave76

Ie9 appears to be faster than Firefox on your snip.

In this benchmark higher is better.

imeem

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Dave76

Ie9 appears to be faster than Firefox on your snip.

In this benchmark higher is better.

i know that. But other ppl posted chrome vs. IE9 and chrome got way higher scores. I can't test chrome myself because it won't start up.

stve

Opera rules Peacekeeper

Punkster

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Hellriser

Did the test on Palemoon 3.6.14

Hmm.. that avatar looks familiar, waaaaaaaaaaaay too much familiar

Hehe. Did you take it from me? (Just wondering)

Phone Man

IE9-64bit is NOT running the same engine as IE9-32bit and it shows.

MS put their resources into the 32bit IE and just token effort into 64-bit.

IE9-32bit



IE9-64bit


UPDATED TO INCLUDE FF 3 and 4

FF 3.6.15


FF 4.0



Jim

sordid

I ran FF vs Chrome on my local webserver, a very old rig running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS.
The hardware is top notch, Intel P4 2.80GHz w/ a blazing gig of RAM.
Well, I only use it for testing purposes so it's sufficient.

The results are devastating for FF - they can be grateful the canvas tests is not part of the final result because Chrome appeared to be 10x faster at least.

So here's the shameful facts for FF:



And here's Chrome in all its glory:

Maxxwire

�� Quote: Originally Posted by sordid

The results are devastating for FF - they can be grateful the canvas tests is not part of the final result because Chrome appeared to be 10x faster at least.

There was a time when I thought that FF's low Peacemaker Benchmarks were a horrible indictment against the browser, but after I started actually using it I found that it functioned quite well even compared to Opera which is my primary browser and is known to post Peacekeeper Benchmarks over 20,000. Evidently not all Benchmark results translate fully and directly into improved functionality on the internet.

~Maxx~

sordid

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Maxxwire

Evidently not all Benchmark results translate fully and directly into improved functionality on the internet.

No doubt about that, mate.
But I could easily tell by just watching that Chrome performed way better on my tertiary rig.

imeem

IE9 final vs. FF 4 final.

BTw why does IE 9 64 bit is slower than 32 bit? I thought it was suppose to be faster

Phone Man

�� Quote: Originally Posted by imeem

IE9 final vs. FF 4 final.

BTw why does IE 9 64 bit is slower than 32 bit? I thought it was suppose to be faster

MS put their resources in the 32bit version and just a token effort in the 64-bit. The 64-bit uses the old engine from IE8 while the 32bit got an updated engine.

Jim

yohoyoho

image attatched

Britton30

bleah! yuck!, etc. A zero on complex graphics.

Raynian

LOL. But in real usage, My FF4 works much faster than my IE9

gendoikari1

Usually I use Opera. I'm still sticking with it.

recall

My results

MadSupra354

I still like Internet Explorer 9 better

Dave76

Just tested the new Chrome 12.0.712.0 dev release.

MadSupra354

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Dave76

Just tested the new Chrome 12.0.712.0 dev release.

Attachment 145788

Where? I can't find it

indianacarnie

Opera 11.01
AMD Turion x2
4 GB RAM

2911 points and I did have other tabs open

Dave76

�� Quote: Originally Posted by MadSupra354

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Dave76

Just tested the new Chrome 12.0.712.0 dev release.

Attachment 145788

Where? I can't find it

The Chromium Projects


Click here:
Early Access Release Channels


Look for: Subscribing to a channel

johncc

Opera is growing on me; it seems a lot faster than the others - not reflected in this benchmark, but in the user experience for the sites I generally visit. After so many years with FF, Opera has become my default (love the built-in "No Script" & blazing fast image load; hosts file takes care of the ad filtering.)

[I seem to recall FF 3.6 scored near 10 000 before, however, it is faster than the previous release whatever this benchmark says.]

oreo27

Here's the overall benchmark on all the installed browsers on my system.



Here's Chrome



Firefox



Internet Explorer



My personal choice is still Firefox.

soho1

My results:

• Could not find result for key 5f4P. If you trying to benchmark another browser please make sure you have copied the url correctly and try again.

Perhaps it did not like the many browsers I have installed.

Phone Man

�� Quote: Originally Posted by soho1

My results:

• Could not find result for key 5f4P. If you trying to benchmark another browser please make sure you have copied the url correctly and try again.

Perhaps it did not like the many browsers I have installed.

I get that same error but somehow I clicked on something (don't remember) and the results showed up. Try refresh, maybe that was it.

Jim

Snowdog

�� Quote: Originally Posted by soho1

My results:

• Could not find result for key 5f4P. If you trying to benchmark another browser please make sure you have copied the url correctly and try again.

Perhaps it did not like the many browsers I have installed.

I think not, likely something wrong with the install portion of the bench mark. I had something similar before.

I would uninstall your old "Futuremark systemInfo".

Then run the benchmark again, don't click "run without system scan", let it scan.

FWIW, here are my results. Despite it being "slowest" FF4 is my browser of choice and the speed differences don't show up in the real world. I just keep the others around for testing.

Even when I had IE8 and it was reporting a score of about 1200, it was still unnoticeable.

SRWare Iron, is Chrome enhanced for privacy (removed calling home to Google, and always running agent). I think it is also the first time I cracked 10000.

stve

I've had the same problem with Opera, Chrome & Firefox over the last few months every now & again I get the could not find the result message & have to reload the page to get it to show

ganjiry

Hi all,
heres mine.

stve

New snapshot Opera 11.10 beta Build 2076 tested with latest browsers.

IownAmoneyPit

�� Quote: Originally Posted by IownAmoneyPit

IE 9 RC and FF beta 11

Scores are now much higher on a newly built system and release of IE 9 final and FF 4.0

Dave76

Nice jump in the scores, the new rig must be quick

IownAmoneyPit

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Dave76

Nice jump in the scores, the new rig must be quick

Rig takes more time on BIOS screen than starting windows to desktop, the SSD and 2600K processor sure help.

ganjiry

i use chrome all the time so i had not install ie9. i benchmarked ie8 and it was terrible. it barely scored a 1000.

heres my chrome and ie9 benches

diehrd

Chrome(v10.0.648.204) Scored:
10713 Points


Thats with a boat load of tabs open so I am sorta happy I scored that well .

kurahk7

Attached is the score with my CR-48 running the latest Beta update.

Dave76

Something wrong there, my last Chrome v11 build was +10k.

We have similar system build, the score should be much higher.

kurahk7

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Dave76

Something wrong there, my last Chrome v11 build was +10k.

We have similar system build, the score should be much higher.

There's nothing wrong, it's just that I ran it using my chromebook.

Dave76

Ah ha, I see now

yohoyoho

a little slow

Britton30

I have tried Opera based on the glowing reports. This screen was sohown for several minutes. For me Opera=0.

Attachment 147868

ganjiry

lol opera just cant seem 2 get a decent browser 2gether can they.

Maxxwire

So if Opera is not a decent browser then what does that say about every other browser that scored less than Opera's blazing 20,302 at Peacekeeper???

@Britton30- Before you discredit the fastest browser to ever test at Peacemaker you might consider that there may be some problems over at the Peacekeeper website that are causing the problem you are experiencing. According to the message I just got wen I visited there a few minutes ago the website does not currently have a valid digital certificate.

~Maxx~

Britton30

@Maxx~
I'm not discrediting Opera but saying it doesn't work on my system. I'm inclined to believe that it's not all in the browser either, but rather the system specs as well. You have a blazing Intel CPU and I have a flickering AMD X4.
I've tried the much bally-hooed Firefox too along with Safari and Chrome but I have so far returned to IE8. Heck, I'm not jumping on the IE9 early adopter wagon.

ganjiry

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Britton30

@Maxx~
I'm not discrediting Opera but saying it doesn't work on my system. I'm inclined to believe that it's not all in the browser either, but rather the system specs as well. You have a blazing Intel CPU and I have a flickering AMD X4.
I've tried the much bally-hooed Firefox too along with Safari and Chrome but I have so far returned to IE8. Heck, I'm not jumping on the IE9 early adopter wagon.

i benchmarked ie9 the other day on the same system as i benched chrome miniutes apart. ie9 was knowhere near as quick as chrome. on my system anyway

Maxxwire

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Britton30

@Maxx~
I'm not discrediting Opera but saying it doesn't work on my system. I'm inclined to believe that it's not all in the browser either, but rather the system specs as well.

Yes, system specs have a lot to do with it as evidenced by my Win 7 desktop being able to score just over 3 times as high on Peacekeeper as my Vista laptop both computers running Opera.

~Maxx~

oreo27

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Maxxwire

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Britton30

@Maxx~
I'm not discrediting Opera but saying it doesn't work on my system. I'm inclined to believe that it's not all in the browser either, but rather the system specs as well.

Yes, system specs have a lot to do with it as evidenced by my Win 7 desktop being able to score just over 3 times as high on Peacekeeper as my Vista laptop both computers running Opera.

~Maxx~

Yup. I noticed that too.

Benchmarks are truly to test different browsers on the same system. Speaking of which, I'll do a Internet Explorer 9 benchmark and update here

Britton30

A new IE8 assessment today. Old was 939

Attachment 147893

EDIT: I just tried to check Opera again and the Peacekeeper page stuck again, maybe server overload.

mpam

Here are a few benchmarks I ran a few days ago (NB: Opera 11.00 is a spoof, it's in fact Iron 10 ^^):

And more global results:

kurahk7

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Britton30

I have tried Opera based on the glowing reports. This screen was sohown for several minutes. For me Opera=0.

Attachment 147868

You're not supposed to run it with Turbo mode; Turbo mode is for those with slow dial-up connections.

oreo27

�� Quote: Originally Posted by oreo27

Here's the overall benchmark on all the installed browsers on my system.

Attachment 145893

Here's Chrome

Attachment 145896

Firefox

Attachment 145895

Internet Explorer

Attachment 145894

My personal choice is still Firefox.

And just to add.

stve

Chromium just manages to grab top spot owing to its massive lead in the data section,
Data is the section that takes less than a second on my PC.
Opera has a healthy lead in all the other sections of the Peacekeeper test especially Complex Graphics that is not included in the overall score.

Quote:

Complex graphics
These tests use 'Canvas', a new web technology for drawing and manipulating graphics without external plug-ins. Canvas is not yet supported by all major browsers so the scores from these tests are not included in the overall Peacekeeper score.

All Major browsers now support Complex Graphics

A Guy

Opera 11.01





A Guy

RitualJman

Maxxwire

The new 120 GB 25nm Intel 320 SSD gave Opera 11.10 a boost in its Peacekeeper score on my Win 7 x64 desktop...

~Maxx~

Commodore Pet

Here is mine with 64 bit Nightly6.0a1. I might try it again with 64 bit explorer 9 just to compare.

Commodore Pet

Now with IE9

A Guy

Opera 11.10 bumped me a bit.





A Guy

kurahk7

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Commodore Pet

Now with IE9

The x86 version of IE9 uses the new engine while the x64 uses the IE8 engine iirc.

Commodore Pet

Ok I tried the new Opera too. Even though it is 32 bit and I am trying to only use 64 bit software. It is the winner, this week

Subsonic

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Commodore Pet

Here is mine with 64 bit Nightly6.0a1. I might try it again with 64 bit explorer 9 just to compare.

Just installed 64 bit Nightly6.0a1. It is working well and seems very fast, however, I'm unable to get a Peacekeeper benchmark on it. Keeps giving me the following:

Commodore Pet

When you get to that point just do a Refresh/Reload and the results should appear.

Subsonic

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Commodore Pet

When you get to that point just do a Refresh/Reload and the results should appear.

Now I'm not even getting to that point. Its choking here:

Maxxwire

Subsonic- I tried to benchmark Opera 11.10 twice last night and I got exactly the same results that you did.

~Maxx~

.

A Guy

yes, just ran it again, and it stops there. Must be a Peacekeeper problem. A Guy

Subsonic

�� Quote: Originally Posted by A Guy

yes, just ran it again, and it stops there. Must be a Peacekeeper problem. A Guy

Good to know. I've never had a problem benchmarking any browser before and now I get the same result whether I use IE9, Firefox 4, or Nightly 6. Hopefully they'll sort it soon. Anyway... 64 bit Nightly 6.0a1 seems real fast too me!

johncc

I have tried the sunspider 0.9.1 JS benchmark and it tells a slightly different story, though not as comprehensive as the Peacekeeper test. IE9 renders JS fastest on my system, followed by FF4. Chrome is slowest.

IE9 - 199.9ms
FF4 - 224.6ms
Opera - 235.1ms
Chrome - 262.0ms

Attachment shows IE9 and FF4

There's something about the Peacekeeper test that does an injustice to IE9; though it's my least favourite browser, it is quick in a way Opera is quick yet it generally rates lower than Chrome and FF4. And my measurements for FF4 recently confirm that in my system, at least, Firefox has become a lot slower (1/3 of the speed of 3.62 per the Peacekeeper test!) - intuition tells me there is something not quite right about that particular benchmark.

Mike Connor

Well, just for giggles...........



Regards....Mike Connor

richport29

These are my results.

stve

First time I've topped 16,000

richport29

�� Quote: Originally Posted by stve

First time I've topped 16,000

Nice score.

Are you using default settings in Opera?. I've noticed in this thread Opera and Chrome scores are usually very close. However on my PC opera scores over 1000 points less, weird.

stve

I'm using default settings Opera 11.50 alpha build 1009 downloaded as the portable option.
They are still not including the Complex graphics scores even though all major browsers support them else Opera would have won by a wider margin maybe topping 17,000

richport29

�� Quote: Originally Posted by stve

I'm using default settings Opera 11.50 alpha build 1009 downloaded as the portable option.
They are still not including the Complex graphics scores even though all major browsers support them else Opera would have won by a wider margin maybe topping 17,000

Hmmm, where can I get the portable version?

stve

For the stable version Opera 11.10 download it at Opera web browser | Faster & safer | Download the latest Internet browser free

For the latest snapshot on the Next channel get it at Opera web browser | Opera 11.50 alpha

Both versions have the option to install as a portable version built into the installer.

When you download the Installer click on options & on the second screen change the install path anywhere outside program files make sure you make a new folder to install into.
When you have changed the install path the install for option becomes available change to stand alone installation USB for the portable.

no entries get changed in the registry, If you want to uninstall it simply delete the folder.

StalkeR

My score. I haven't posted here for a while..

richport29

�� Quote: Originally Posted by stve

For the stable version Opera 11.10 download it at Opera web browser | Faster & safer | Download the latest Internet browser free

For the latest snapshot on the Next channel get it at Opera web browser | Opera 11.50 alpha

Both versions have the option to install as a portable version built into the installer.

When you download the Installer click on options & on the second screen change the install path anywhere outside program files make sure you make a new folder to install into.
When you have changed the install path the install for option becomes available change to stand alone installation USB for the portable.

no entries get changed in the registry, If you want to uninstall it simply delete the folder.

thanks

StalkeR

This is strange... On Firefox 4.0.1 I got 3886 score,but now on Chrome on Linux....

oreo27

�� Quote: Originally Posted by StalkeR

This is strange... On Firefox 4.0.1 I got 3886 score,but now on Chrome on Linux....
Attachment 154635

What's so odd about that?

StalkeR

Give a look again at the results and you'll see what's so odd. The benchmark of the Chrome is bigger that FF.

Dave76

If you mean the benchmark score for Chrome is higher than the benchmark score for FF, just look back through this thread and you'll see that it is normal.

For this benchmark Chrome scores much higher than FF.

StalkeR

Yes,I know that Chrome has higher score than FF,but not so high...

TheReaper

Here's mine:



Is it a good, bad or average result for FF 4.0.1?

Commodore Pet

The race is on. It is neck and neck.

64 bit Nightly
32 bit Opera

stve

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Commodore Pet

Ok I tried the new Opera too. Even though it is 32 bit and I am trying to only use 64 bit software. It is the winner, this week

That's a big slowdown for Opera from 10757 4 weeks ago.

added Safari to my previous result as well as being the slowest it has problems with pasting the Peacekeeper link into the address bar I finally worked out how to do it.
Paste the result in and delete the last character & add it back with the keyboard pretty weird behaviour.

Commodore Pet

�� Quote: Originally Posted by stve

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Commodore Pet

Ok I tried the new Opera too. Even though it is 32 bit and I am trying to only use 64 bit software. It is the winner, this week

That's a big slowdown for Opera from 10757 4 weeks ago.

That is a big drop! Since then, I have changed my internet security software to BitDefender from MSE and turned on SuperAntiSpyware real time scan.

I will start digging.

Commodore Pet

I looked back at my 10757 score and it was with version 11.10 of Opera.

This latest score of 6747 was Opera 11.50. I tried disabling SuperAntiSpyware and BitDefender and the difference was minimal.

I will try 11.10 again and see.

Commodore Pet

Here is 11.11.

Eblim

I was a Firefox user until version 3.6 was released. Got tired of the heavy feeling that Firefox has. They still haven't fixed that heaviness feeling. From the results posted here on Opera, I had to give it a try. I've never used Opera because I never liked the interface, as the last time I used it, it was very poor and minimal looking. I'm disappointed with the results. As far as Safari goes, I would have been shocked to see if it even got half the score Firefox got, but I was even more shocked that it overtook Firefox.

These tests were done on my slowest computer. NOT the computer with the listed specifications.

chrysalis

here mine. main rig but with tons of background apps running.

xHazard

Here are mine

natedp

Pretty terrible IMO...

monsteranh

Is this good?

stve

Been getting inconsistent results with Opera in the rendering section, 3 weeks ago Opera scored nearly 17,910 in the rendering section ran the test a few times since then & rendering scores ranged between approx 12,000 to 15,500.
I suspected it was something to do with the operating system so I tried disabling the page file & the rendering score went up to 18,205, ran the peacekeeper test with a couple of different Opera installs, Opera 11.11 scored 17,400 in the rendering section.

All browsers at 100% view & the Windows page file set to off.

Turning off the Page file only seemed to help Opera.

dogbert2

Here are my results (Win 7 x64 ultimate w/SP1, Quad Core 2.8Ghz AMD, 8GB RAM):<br><br><br>

Guest

google chrome is better than mozilla for my computer.

A Guy

Wondering what it is about this test that Opera scores so much higher than other browsers?



A Guy

TedFire

Opera all the way!

Did this with IE 9 on the same pc and only got about 6600.

Maxxwire

�� Quote: Originally Posted by A Guy

Wondering what it is about this test that Opera scores so much higher than other browsers?

A Guy

Indeed...

~Maxx~

JoshuaXiong

Britton30

IE9 in Win 8 Test

Maccman

Score of 3433 in Firefox3.
Score of 11115 Iron.

Maccman

What does this benchmark test or prove?

A Guy

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Maccman

What does this benchmark test or prove?

Not much I'd say. I don't know it to be a true test of a browsers capabilities in everyday use. I think a good test would be if it displays web pages correctly. How fast it does so. How it does with javascript, etc. For now, it is the chance for us Opera users to say we are #1! Lol. A Guy

Maxxwire

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Maccman

What does this benchmark test or prove?

define.com defines benchmark as...

A test or series of tests designed to compare the qualities or performance of different devices of the same type. Certain sets of computer programs are much used as benchmarks for comparing the performance of different computers.

~Maxx~

.

stve

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Maccman

What does this benchmark test or prove?

Its an Independent benchmark most of the other benchmarks originate with Chrome or Mozilla & its possible they design benchmarks to make their own browser look good compared to the competition.
Peacekeeper its a benchmarking tool for comparing browsers on your own PC & will only tell you what is fastest on your own computer.
Other people with different hardware configuration's may have different rankings to you.

Quote:

From the Peacekeeper FAQ
What is Peacekeeper?

Peacekeeper is a free online browser benchmark tool. With Peacekeeper it�s quick and easy to compare different browsers to find out which one offers the best performance on your PC.
What's with the name?
What can I use it for?

Peacekeeper will show you which browser performs best on your PC. At the end of the test your browser receives a score indicating its overall performance. It�s simple to compare scores by running Peacekeeper again in a different browser. Changing browsers to one that's faster can mean that pages with dynamic content will be more responsive.
What does it test?

Peacekeeper measures your browser's performance by testing its JavaScript functionality. JavaScript is a widely used programming language used in the creation of modern websites to provide features such as animation, navigation, forms and other common requirements. By measuring a browser�s ability to handle commonly used JavaScript functions Peacekeeper can evaluate its performance.

Peacekeeper - The Browser Benchmark from Futuremark Corporation

The Complex graphics scores are still not included in the test

Quote:

6-13-2011, 08:02 PM #4
Jarnis
YouGamers Staff
Arconaut

Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Finland
Posts: 5,540 Re: Complex Graphics (Canvas) still not included in the scores
Yes, but at this point commentary is limited as completely new revision of Peacekeeper is under development.

In other words, minor issues with existing Peacekeeper probably won't be addressed until the new revision is out.
__________________
Jarno Kokko - Senior Editor, YouGamers

MadSupra354

Testing the new Firefox 5 against IE 9.

stve

Couple of weeks ago I posted that turning of the Pageing file increased Operas scores in the rendering section.
Turns out I was wrong I updated the Sun Java plugin & the rendering scores dropped down to 12,000 .
After uninstalling the Sun Java plugin they shot back up again.Post your Internet Browser Benchmark

Benchmarked Opera 11.50 beta build 1065 against Chrome 14

Markmental

Firefox 6 alpha 2 (my baby) I bet i got a low score because I use dsl internet.

Markmental

retest with opera and ie8

Markmental

ran it on my ipod touch with the bing browser.

77273GU

IE 9 wins one.

Gornot

From me, IE10PP2 this time. Pretty darn good considering the performance on my IE9, which is about 5600 points:

ganjiry

heres mine

Subsonic

IE10 looks good. Still gotta have my Firefox extensions though!

PinkRayneDrop

This was with 4 other tabs open, plus other numerous things working in the background. Plus I was scrolling up & down the page.

Is it good?

Gornot

Um, the test clearly states that there shouldn't be any other open browser windows/tabs...

PinkRayneDrop

I know that, but as I was half way through the test I read that part & because I was in the middle of something I was not about to close the tabs to do it.


I just did it again then with no other tabs open, it came out way lower mark. There goes that theory.

Gornot

Weird xD

Dave76

That is strange, I've tried it with other tabs open and with no other tabs open and always got a slightly better score with no tabs open.

PinkRayneDrop

I know right? It's a strange thing but I always do seem to go faster with more open

Commodore Pet

I haven't posted updates in a while. Nightly is 64 bit all others 32 bit. Opera 12 pre-alpha build 1033.

TheReaper

Here's an update of my earlier results.

stve

�� Quote: Originally Posted by PinkRayneDrop

I know right? It's a strange thing but I always do seem to go faster with more open

Coincidence you can repeat the test & get a different score nothing to do with tabs its more to do with system resources.
On a fast PC with 20 tabs open its no problem unless one of those tabs is poorly scripted or is incompatible with your browser.
Even on a fast PC open 100+ tabs & the Peacekeeper scores will drop.

Quote:

What factors affect the score?

Other than the browser itself, the most significant factor affecting the score is the type of CPU in your PC. After that, the power of your graphics card affects the result somewhat, though mostly in situations where the card is very slow, or no drivers have been installed for it. Running other applications that consume system resources at the same time as the benchmark is running will naturally affect the score. The size of the viewable browser area also affects the score, so the screen resolution you use, the size of the browser window and whether the window is minimized affect the score as well. Beyond these, other factors are usually not significant. Your internet connection speed and network latency do not influence the score in any way.

I think the Peacekeeper FAQ used to mention not having tabs in the past but use your commonsense.

stve

Opera scored over 17,000 after I increased my overclock on my i7 920 CPU from 4 Ghz to 4.252 GHZ

A Guy

�� Quote: Originally Posted by stve

Opera scored over 17,000 after I increased my overclock on my i7 920 CPU from 4 Ghz to 4.252 GHZ

Wow

Mine:





A Guy

kurahk7

�� Quote: Originally Posted by stve

Opera scored over 17,000 after I increased my overclock on my i7 920 CPU from 4 Ghz to 4.252 GHZ

Opera 12 lets you have a split screen inside Opera?

A Guy

�� Quote: Originally Posted by kurahk7

�� Quote: Originally Posted by stve

Opera scored over 17,000 after I increased my overclock on my i7 920 CPU from 4 Ghz to 4.252 GHZ

Opera 12 lets you have a split screen inside Opera?

Looks like 2 instances side by side

A Guy

stve

Its Opera's Multiple document interface its not new Opera has always had it. Tabbed browsing came later.
Just right click a tab >arrange & tile . To restore tabbed browsing right click a tab on the tab bar >arrange maximize all.
The second picture shows a page open in the panel as well & after I've grabbed the tab bar & pulled down to show the thumbnails.

stve

Opera 12 pre alpha compared to other browsers.

Dave76

The most ridiculous article on browsers I have seen.

Thought you might get a laugh out of it

BTW, I don't use it anymore

A Guy

Dave, you need to read the forum more The story was posted and discussed. Then the fact it was all a hoax was posted as well

A Guy

Dave76

Link


As per your suggestion, posting from Opera, so far it's good.

A Guy

Internet Explorer Users are More Stupid Than Others: Study

Yeah, I've tried all the browsers, keep FF on my system, but use Opera 99% of the time. A Guy

Belgarionbg

FF forever

Maxxwire

�� Quote: Originally Posted by A Guy

Yeah, I've tried all the browsers, keep FF on my system, but use Opera 99% of the time. A Guy

After enduring the routine crashes of IE5 I looked around to check out my potential browser options and found Firefox 2.14 which I liked, but Opera 9.8 was just what I was looking for. In download bandwidth comparisons using Bandwidth Meter Pro Opera proved to be twice as fast as Firefox at downloading 6 sets of photographs that I have hosted on the internet.

~Maxx~

imeem

FF is still last.

Dave76

Haven't ran this for a while.

'Safari Unknown' is Maxthon 3.1.5.600

stonebear

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Dave76

Haven't ran this for a while.

Safari Unknown is Maxthon 3.1.5.600

Attachment 170721

Why have you got such a high score for Chrome compared to mine, is the dev version that much faster? I might try it, any bugs?








Last time I tried Chrome there was no minimum font setting, now there is I am switching from Firefox.

imeem

�� Quote: Originally Posted by stonebear

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Dave76

Haven't ran this for a while.

Safari Unknown is Maxthon 3.1.5.600

Attachment 170721

Why have you got such a high score for Chrome compared to mine, is the dev version that much faster? I might try it, any bugs?








Last time I tried Chrome there was no minimum font setting, now there is I am switching from Firefox.

maybe because he overclocked his cpu and/or he ran the benchmark minimized?

stonebear

�� Quote: Originally Posted by imeem

maybe because he overclocked his cpu and/or he ran the benchmark minimized?

I didn't realise the CPU would affect the benchmark score so much but I suppose it would.

Anyway, I am just glad I found this thread or I wouldn't have switched to Chrome today, I am loving it.

Dave76

�� Quote: Originally Posted by stonebear

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Dave76

Haven't ran this for a while.

Safari Unknown is Maxthon 3.1.5.600

Why have you got such a high score for Chrome compared to mine, is the dev version that much faster? I might try it, any bugs?



Last time I tried Chrome there was no minimum font setting, now there is I am switching from Firefox.

Browsers use your hardware (GPU is an option) for acceleration, so it also depends on your system.
My CPU is overclocked but, EIST is enabled so when this test ran it was running at a mere 1.440GHz.

BTW, I ran the test with my browser at my usual size, ~95% of the screen, not minimized.

I've been using the Chrome dev channel version for over two years. Only had one issue and was back to dev channel in a couple of days. It's been great, with only the one issue.

This benchmark is for you to compare how different browsers run on your system, or maybe someone with a near identical system.

stonebear

I just found your score shockingly high, lol.

I agree the main use is to compare browsers on your own system. FF actually feels slower to me and the benchmark shows that.

I tried the test again with the CPU at different speeds and the difference in the score was negligible if there was any difference at all.

Dave76

If you look through the thread you will see higher scores than mine

stve

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Dave76

If you look through the thread you will see higher scores than mine

My CPU is an Intel i920 overclocked to 4.25 Ghz the latest generation of Intel CPU's run approximately 17% faster than mine & can be overclocked to 5 Ghz.

I captured the Opera browser running Peacekeeper to video , recording video is a performance hit, recording full screen you lose around 2,000 points so I recorded a smaller window unfortunately Opera was not centered properly & the left hand edge is lost.
Opera12 build1047 Peacekeeper - YouTube
The video is 5 minutes long , the beginning shows me installing Opera as a Portable version using the options.

stve

Opera 12 is build 1065 snapshot

Peacekeeper - free universal browser test from Futuremark

johncc

I ran this on Win 8/ Windows Developer in order to test IE10; not that promising on my system.

Dave76

That score seems about right for IE, all browser tests run differently.

It's a way to tell how different browsers run on your system, I always use the seat of the pants test when choosing a primary browser.

I use IE9 and the Win8 IE10, for certain sites that run better on that browser, Chrome for general browsing - works well with google search for some reason, Opera works the best for me on Seven and Eight Forums.

And remember Win8 Dev is a pre-beta version as is IE10, so is not 'polished'.

JaidynM

Looks like Chrome won it for me, and by a long shot. Not sure if I'll change from Firefox but I'll give it a try. Especially since Mozilla seem to have gone mad, switching browser might not be such a bad idea.

NRT

here is mine

A Guy

�� Quote: Originally Posted by JaidynM

Looks like Chrome won it for me, and by a long shot. Not sure if I'll change from Firefox but I'll give it a try. Especially since Mozilla seem to have gone mad, switching browser might not be such a bad idea.

Attachment 175877

Use the one you like Jaidyn, as I find this mostly useless. If you had Opera, and tested that, it would have likely won. So individual browsers score better, but it doesn't mean they are better (for you). A Guy

fanec75m

here i think i am in the middle

JaidynM

�� Quote: Originally Posted by A Guy

�� Quote: Originally Posted by JaidynM

Looks like Chrome won it for me, and by a long shot. Not sure if I'll change from Firefox but I'll give it a try. Especially since Mozilla seem to have gone mad, switching browser might not be such a bad idea.

Attachment 175877

Use the one you like Jaidyn, as I find this mostly useless. If you had Opera, and tested that, it would have likely won. So individual browsers score better, but it doesn't mean they are better (for you). A Guy

Fair enough. All the same, I might still give Chrome a try. For all I know, I might like it better!

maluthor

I think that you can use any type of opening system for use any web browser all type of browser are supported
Firefox 3.0.10 (no proxy) 1121
Chrome (with IE proxy) 3308
Internet Explorer

Shukaku

Since I use only Chrome, here's my benchmark.

GeneO

Here are my latest. It doesn't reflect the dip in my Firefox 9.0.x nightly x64 below 8000. It could be updated graphics drivers, but I suspect it is Firefox (chrome doesn't dip). I mostly use Firefox nightly x64.

Dch48

Here's my results. Even though Chrome won, I'll still use IE9 for a few reasons. There is no discernible difference in speed in actual browsing and I think IE9 is a lot more secure. The script shield in Avast also scans all scripts in IE and none at all in Chrome.

Dave76

It's just an indication of how the browsers are running on your system.

Run the one you like, with todays browsers the benchmark differences are hardly noticeable in real world usage.

Maxxwire

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Dch48

The script shield in Avast also scans all scripts in IE and none at all in Chrome.

That's a pretty compelling reason right there! BTW might I know you from the Comodo Forums?

~Maxx~

Dch48

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Maxxwire

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Dch48

The script shield in Avast also scans all scripts in IE and none at all in Chrome.

That's a pretty compelling reason right there! BTW might I know you from the Comodo Forums?

~Maxx~

Yep you sure do

dreamer

Chrome is the clear winner on my laptop but i am surprised by the performance of Internet explorer

richport29

�� Quote: Originally Posted by dreamer

Chrome is the clear winner on my laptop but i am surprised by the performance of Internet explorer

Are you using the 32 bit IE9 or the 64 bit?

The 32 bit version has much better performance.

elfsun

This is my result in Avant browser with IE rendering mode and firefox mode

dreamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by richport29

Are you using the 32 bit IE9 or the 64 bit?

The 32 bit version has much better performance.

I am using 64 bit IE9.....

richport29

�� Quote: Originally Posted by dreamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by richport29

Are you using the 32 bit IE9 or the 64 bit?

The 32 bit version has much better performance.

I am using 64 bit IE9.....

I thought so. The 32 bit version has the new engine, the 64 bit doesn't (much slower).

Give the 32 bit a try.

Commodore Pet

This brings up a good point. When is the 64 bit version getting a new engine? Is it a new engine in IE10 64 bit?

Phone Man

Jim

stve

Peacekeeper are now testing a new Beta version.
hers my results.
Peacekeeper - free universal browser test from Futuremark

A Guy

Here's mine, Opera 11.51

Peacekeeper - free universal browser test from Futuremark

A Guy

stve

Looks like we are going to have to adjust to the new low scores but I miss the bouncing balls , floating dandelion seeds wafting in the breeze is a poor substitute.

Maxxwire

�� Quote: Originally Posted by stve

Looks like we are going to have to adjust to the new low scores.

It seems that you will have a lot more of an adjustment to make than the rest of us...

~Maxx~

Commodore Pet

Here are my new results with the BETA of Peacekeeper, Opera has now been beat by Nightly(Firefox)! This is new.

Opera 12 Build 1076 32 bit
Opera 11.51 32 bit
Nightly(Firefox) 10.0a1 64 bit
IE 9.0 32 bit

oreo27

Using BETA peacekeeper. Got these results on my Rig. Still using Firefox though.

http://www.sevenforums.com/attachmen...1&d=1317453890

Maxxwire

I ran Opera 12 Beta through Peacekeeper Beta for the first time with this result...

Edit- 10-7-2011... I just ran Opera Next 12 build 1085 with the new Core rendering engine (Presto) version 2.9.220 through Peacekeeper Beta and the score soared 11% by over 300 points! Go Presto!

~Maxx~

Hawaiian

Dont have chrome up yet. 5911 is IE9 64bit, 5660 is IE9 32Bit and 5308 is FireFox v6.0.2

96accord

The test takes longer than I thought. I'm running it in Chrome and it's still going..

Edit:

FireFox ---------------> 1721
IE8 -------------------> 214
Chrome ---------------> 2137

Why are they so low? I'm using my work PC with Windows XP Pro.. :/

stve

Reading the Peacekeeper forum it seems after feedback from users they have tweaked a couple of tests so earlier results might be inconsistent with present ones.
I've tested the latest browser snapshots apart from IE 9 which is the current stable release.
The Latest Opera snapshots now have full hardware acceleration with WebGL.

Commodore Pet

Here are mine again using Opera 12 pre-alpha build 1116 with hardware acceleration 32 bit, Opera 11.52 32 bit, Waterfox 7 which is optimized for 64 bit and Nightly 10.0a1 64 bit.

GeneO

Here is my latest compendium. I downloaded IE9 once more With a even a medium performance graphics card like the Nvidia GTS 450, it falls at the bottom of the barrel - pretty abysmal, and my Windows 7 was more sluggish after the update. So you can't uninstall it and System Restore doesn't work (sfc errors galore) so I had to restore from a backup.

Anyhow hope this wide coverage helps. Firefox is still my go to browser.

python134r

Firefox 7.01-5983
Chrome 15.0.874-11,520

stve

Tested Opera 12 build 1155 with Hardware Acceleration & its very fast in the rendering & complex graphics section's.

caleb97

Chrome always seems to come out on top. I use it as my primary browser. Opera also seems to be pretty good.

Dave76

�� Quote: Originally Posted by stve

Tested Opera 12 build 1155 with Hardware Acceleration & its very fast in the rendering & complex graphics section's.

It is very fast for me, even with my slow connection, impressive bump in speed from 11.52.

Darcy Peal

My score with IE9 was 1347, but I got a lot of missing codecs error messages?

dumpystig

Been having probs with IE9 x64 running way too slow so last night I went to IE9 x32, I noticed a big difference immediately. 24 hours on and I come across this tester so just gave it a punt with several browsers...

IE9 x64: 902
IE9 x32: 1420
Opera: 2456
Chrome: 3048

Will try Firefox later and then do some fettling with each browser but it looks like I may be converting to Chrome, although any helpful advice/recommendations will be welcome.
One thing's for certain - IE is soon to be binned...

Commodore Pet

This test was done with just 64 bit browsers. Opera 64 bit takes the lead!

RitualJman

Can some one explain why i am being compared to a bunch of tablets?

stve

Because a tablet or smart phone model are all identical & return the same score so helpfully their scores are shown so you can compare them to your PC.
With a PC its different so many different hardware configuration's everyone gets different scores you need to run Pecekeeper on a different browser to see how Firefox rates versus the competition on your own PC.

StalkeR

I got error on html5...

DaGooN

think my gfx card is my problem? back on my trusted 9600GT 512
sold my 560..

Dave76

Here is my latest run.



The last Opera is 12.00 64bit.

GeneO

With a new MB and CPU, here are my results for Chrome and Firefox from both Peacekeeper1 and the new, fugly, peacekeeper.

Archangel83

Oh man I need to build a new system

Dave76

Try testing with Chrome, Opera or firefox. IE9 seems to get low scores on this test.

startas

Well, i noticed, that runing tests and browsing real pages are different things, and all that hardware acceleration stuff in new browsers, even if disabled, makes lags and doesn't help at all (except introducing new bugs ), so i'm back to firefox 3

chrysalis

I disabled hardwarew acceleration in IE and firefox for pwoer saving reasons, if its on in IE, then some pages will ramp up the clocks on my gfx card, FF is much worse tho if hardware direct3d and directdraw is enabled (the default) then simply opening the browser to any page ramps up the 3d graphics card to full clocks. I think until html5 is much widespread use using software graphics mode is fine. I also run flash in software mode as well so youtube doesnt ramp up my 3d hardware.

The silent

Ehm????

i am really confused now...

the browser which runs the smoothest of the three gets the lowest score?

A Guy

Welcome to Seven Forums The silent. It's not about running smoothest, although that is likely what you want to use as a benchmark. It's about the latest web standards, and how well the browsers support them. Nothing matters more then your experience while using them. A Guy

The silent

True!

Urthboundmisfit

Firefox 13
Attachment 215805

Chrome 19
Attachment 215806

A Guy

Maybe useful for comparing browsers on ones own system. But not for comparing to others as the system specs, codecs installed, etc. influence the result. here's Opera 11.64



A Guy

2PMHottest

here is my benchmark.

theveterans

I just downloaded the latest Chrome 23 today.

Here are the results based on my hardware:

Celeron 877 @ 1.4 GHz, 8 GB DDR3-10666, HD Graphics 2000, 5400 rpm HDD
Windows 7 power plan set to Balanced

theveterans

�� Quote: Originally Posted by A Guy

Attachment 215809

A Guy

I just noticed that my score and your score contains the same set of numbers, but the numbers are arranged differently (3179 and 3971).

Vipermk2

In order of slowest to fastest

1. IE
2. Firefox 32bit
3. Firefox 64bit
4. Comodo Dragon

A Guy

My internet is slow for a change right now, but...Opera 12.01



A Guy

Vipermk2

Just tried Opera and it's pretty nippy, shame about customizing the bookmarks toolbar though. After importing 100's of them from FF, I would have liked to have all the bookmark folders aligned across the top like in FF and Chrome

theveterans

Try using Chrome. Your scores should go up to 5500 or more.

Vipermk2

�� Quote: Originally Posted by theveterans

Try using Chrome. Your scores should go up to 5500 or more.

look at post #659 Comodo Dragon is built on chrome

boohbah

When I benchmark my browser, I got HTTP ERROR 404 "Not found".

cryptoncore

?me too, google peacekeeper benchmark

RoasterMen

�� Quote: Originally Posted by JonathanV

When I benchmark my browser, I got HTTP ERROR 404 "Not found".

Same O.o

Britton30

Google Chrome (Windows Seven Forums open)

Guest

with google chrome version 22.0.1229.94 m




[img]http://s10.**************/6bsbhz84l/Untitled.jpg[/img]

Guest

I have 4675 points on FireFox.

Guest

ie9

A Guy

Opera's HTML5 Capabilities dropped to 3/7 with 12.11, from 5/7 with 11.64 Capricious test methinks.

A Guy

Britton30

I agree Bill. As long as I can access the webs it's fine by me.

leonvictor2012

I verify Firefox and Safari but Firefox is much faster and chrome is at its higher speed only.

theveterans

Downloaded IE 10 RP a couple of days ago. Much more responsive than IE9. The only bug I notice is that the full screen menu won't show if I hover my mouse to the top of the screen. I have to right-click on a page for the menu to show up, but it doesn't disappear again (this is another bug where the menu doesn't retract after it appeared). Basically, full screen IE 10 behaves like Metro IE.



Specs:

Intel celeron 17 watt TDP @ 1.4 GHz
Intel HD 2000 graphics
8 GB DDR3 RAM
5400 RPM HDD

indianacarnie

I too think the test is capricious. Been using Opera for years now and Maxthon3 for about 6 months as a secondary browser. Was more than a little surprised to see these results.



Opera is the first one, Maxthon3 the second. Just started using the "newest version", cloud based and have cut back on its use because of that. Impressive numbers though........

braddersz

My test:

theveterans

Id say mine is poor considering im running Core I7, 8GB ram, SSD, With a broadband connection of 39mb down 8mb up

Britton30

�� Quote: Originally Posted by braddersz

Id say mine is poor considering im running Core I7, 8GB ram, SSD, With a broadband connection of 39mb down 8mb up

Attachment 252420

Try Chrome 24 or 23 and you should see more than 4000 scores with your system.

PCTechie

I think IE9 chokes of the dandelion farts fliorts test.

Guest

Very Poor right!

Britton30

Opera 12.14, it wouldn't play any of the videos. IE9 does.

Golden

Chrome

Superluigi6

Using Google Chrome 24.0.1312.57:

theveterans

Chrome 25

indianacarnie

Figured I'd test the new I.E.10 These are the three browsers on my machine. Number 1 is Opera, number 2 is Maxthon and number 3 is I.E.10

theveterans

�� Quote: Originally Posted by theveterans

Downloaded IE 10 RP a couple of days ago. Much more responsive than IE9. The only bug I notice is that the full screen menu won't show if I hover my mouse to the top of the screen. I have to right-click on a page for the menu to show up, but it doesn't disappear again (this is another bug where the menu doesn't retract after it appeared). Basically, full screen IE 10 behaves like Metro IE.

Attachment 245125

Ie 10 rtm. The problem I mentioned above is now gone. However, I find that IE 10 RTM and RP still crashes on 1st try when uploading files to virustotal.com

theveterans

IE 10 RTM did increase its score from 2309 to 2332 in my case.

ThrashZone

Not sure it was a fair test Java is not installed only deployment kit and even it was disabled many storage item are disabled,
I got 1605 with gpu rendering activate on ie10

A Guy

Welcome to Seven Forums ThrashZone. I have found this test capricious at the least. So many system variables contribute to the result. That said Chrome has consistently been on top. Still using Opera regardless

A Guy

indianacarnie

I agree with A Guy about the test being capricious at best. And about using Opera Use whichever browser works best for YOU and don't worry too much about benchmarks.

ThrashZone

As you can tell the Lack of codec's was the reason for the lower score, 3/7.
ie10 works very well with occasional quirk which is normal for new browsers/ new Java version just about every day
Odd flash player releases but youtube keeps going on strong, and webpages rendering well is all I really care about/ Not a gamer anyway,
Cheers.

Dude

Is it weird I enjoy benchmarks?

Here is mine

theveterans

I ran the Peacekeeper

indianacarnie

�� Quote: Originally Posted by theveterans

Attachment 257718

Updated my Intel HD 3000 Graphics Drivers to the latest version and IE 10 made a nice jump to 2450

theveterans

Just updated my Opera today.



Still only 3 for 7 HTML5 though, it actually scored a little less than previous version. Still Operas MY browser

A Guy

Disabling Windows Aero increased IE 10 score to 2480 from 2450!

theveterans

�� Quote: Originally Posted by theveterans

Disabling Windows Aero increased IE 10 score to 2480 from 2450!
Attachment 263005

Lol. Try it from safe mode with networking

A Guy

A Guy

�� Quote: Originally Posted by A Guy

�� Quote: Originally Posted by theveterans

Disabling Windows Aero increased IE 10 score to 2480 from 2450!
Attachment 263005

Lol. Try it from safe mode with networking

A Guy

Wouldn't that disable the graphics drivers thus resulting to horrible scores

theveterans

It was a joke You disabling things to get a better score

A Guy

Guest

�� Quote: Originally Posted by A Guy

It was a joke You disabling things to get a better score

A Guy

I'm just being curious of how disabling Windows Aero can improve graphics performance in games and benchmarks since I read many threads about that topic. I wish there is a "safe mode with GPU drivers enabled," but that contradicts the purpose of "safe mode."

qwertymikey

Faladu

Aero is just a feature that uses more resources, thus get rid of it and performance improves, although 30 points on this benchmark is not very much.

Icons and gadgets on your desktop all use resources, limiting those can help as well, with a stellar CPU and video card, won't matter much though.

stve

Here is mine

aritra2116

Tested the latest browsers



Opera 15 is the latest stable release, Opera 16 is a Next release.
Chrome 30 is the latest Chromium build.

madcratebuilder

Here are my scores. Chrome 28 scored 2146 and IE 10 scored 1071.

Gornot

Much to lazy to reconfigure for a browser BM. FF as used with all add-ons and IE with no add-ons.

Dude

I decided to put Firefox 24 up against IE11 and got some really interesting results:



The "unknown unknown" is IE11 Release Preview that scored 1798 with 5/7 HTML capabilities. The two missing features were Theora and WebM codecs.

Firefox 24 scored only 1666 with 7/7 capabilities, and the difference was extremely apparent with the dandelion DOM test and animated sprites (the recorded airplane game used in one of the tests).

Gornot

Seems like the test likes the latest chrome update

stve

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Dude

Seems like the test likes the latest chrome update
Attachment 291341

haha no way

Guest

Just finished building my new PC .

Tews

Chrome ..



Firefox ..

stve

Opera 18 & Opera 12 the last version before Opera moved to Chromium Blink .

A Guy

stve, what's your opinion on the new Opera? I am still on 12 as I read all the missing things...no bookmarks??

A Guy

Britton30

Opera is now just a rebranded Google Chrome?

stve

�� Quote: Originally Posted by A Guy

stve, what's your opinion on the new Opera? I am still on 12 as I read all the missing things...no bookmarks??

A Guy

It has bookmarks its the same bookmark bar as is in Chrome , Opera still lacks a shortcut to toggle the bar ( you have to enter settings) & it still has no bookmark manager.
Compared to Opera 12 i miss Notes the most followed by the very flexible user interface & the integrated mail.

Overall i prefer The new Chromium Blink based Opera its much more stable & I love the revamped Speed Dial page , you can now drag speed dials together to create folders , save all open tabs to a speed dial group ( same as sessions in Opera 12)
The Stash & Discover options on the speed dial page are great , Stash is where you can store tabs.
Discover is the latest news stories you have two options.
Top Stories is the default but you can use the drop down list to choose from various categories i.e. Travel, Science etc...
The other option is choose your country change to another country & get a different perspective on the news.

Opera still has Turbo its called Off-Road Mode now ( you request a page & Opera compresses it & delivers it your phone or desktop from its servers speeding up slow connections.) I like Of-Road Mode more for bypassing the increasing amount amount of censorship on the net.

Opera has the best installer of any browser Opera Desktop Team - Desktop Team
If you choose Options you can change the Install path (need to use the Make new folder button to keep the files grouped) you can now choose the install for option & choose standalone USB to install it as a Portable version.

A Guy

Thanks stve. I have simple needs, but the bookmarks as they are in 12 is a must. Sucks my favorite browser is getting no updates, but instead has forked into something I don't want. A Guy

theveterans

IE 11 32-bit RTM shows up as unknown unknown LOL. Negligible difference in scores compared to IE 10 (2450) except for more HTML5 capabilities

Tews

Not too shabby.

jimroad471

Wishmaster

Tested a bunch and the results were ...

Britton30

IE11 Unknown, odd.

starbucks107

Firefox
Firefox/30.0
1930 Points

starbucks107

Firefox
Firefox/30.0
1930 Points

starbucks107

LIKE THESE DONKEYS! IMAGINE....KICKING YOUR OWN ASS?
iT'S BAD ENOUGH TO HAVE SOMEONE ELSE DO IT!

oogoomail

Intel Pentium Dual-Core 2.1Ghz
3Gb RAM DDR2
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator for Mobile

Vipermk2

I think my Firefox must be wrong, just downloaded the new 64bit

stve

Very weird so I downloaded Firefox nightly Win64 & it happened to me as well.

Commodore Pet

I just ran mine and Vivaldi 64 bit came out on top(shows as chrome version 40) then last was Palemoon (shows as Firefox). Keep in mind I have no addon's running in Vivaldi yet.

Trax

Put it this way I still use Opera 12 and no clue what it would benchmark out at, only that it always passes the acid test and the only browser that can make that claim

A Guy

Trax, I too still use Opera 12. It tests decent, but these tests are skewed towards the Chromium based browsers. Supposedly faster . Nice to see the other Opera 12 user here, lol. A Guy

A Guy

I ran mine for Firefox. My firefox is slow recently. I am posting the Browser test result. How do I improve the performance on FireFox?

Thanks for sharing.

Guest

�� Quote: Originally Posted by MDRI

How do I improve the performance on FireFox?

Perhaps?

SpeedyFox - Boost Firefox,Skype,Chrome,Thunderbird in a Single Click! | CRYSTALIDEA Software

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/fir...cmanfasterfox/

If you have many add-ons installed, this is the major reason for slowness. Not only the number, but sometimes they can clash. If you do have many, think about what you actually need.

A Guy