Post your Internet Browser Benchmark part 4

Mercurial

Alright so lets have a "fastest browser contest" :P
Basically you just benchmark your browser here Peacekeeper - The Browser Benchmark and post the results here ! you can benchmark as many browsers as you like that you use on your system...

Here I go
P4 2.8ghz
1gb RAM
128 GPU RAM no pixel shader (Lol)
Firefox wins for me :P

Captain Zero

What a silly bench but fun, nonetheless. 1128 with IE8 x32.

Edit; Re-ran with Minefield x64 and Java x64.

ickymay

I am an undying Opera fan

Mercurial

lol nice whats your specs o.o

Quill

Here we go:

Top left to right firefox 3.5b5 followed by firefox x64 3.5b4
bottom left to right IE followed by IE x64

I tried with Opera but it complained it couldn't find MSVCRT71.DLL not my problem so I uninstalled it right away. Google Chrome wouldn't even connect to the page... gone too

All in all firefox was the easiest, didn't need anything, unlike IE which needed to download some ActiveX controls (Meh!) Was the fastest by far too.

I was also downloading some files during the tests too...

nate42nd

I ran it with other tabs open first them again with none. Chrome does pretty well.
Attachment 11209
Attachment 11211

IE 8 is just embarrassing. I couldn't even post it.

nate42nd

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Captain Zero

Edit; Re-ran with Minefield x64 and Java x64.

I need to get on-board with the x64 Java. Looks good !

swarfega

IE8 (with proxy) 989
IE8 (64-bit with proxy) 1004
IE8 (64-bit with proxy and 64-bit java) 1121
Chrome (with IE proxy) 3308
Firefox 3.0.10 (no proxy) 1121

so clear winner for me is Chrome.

nate42nd

I just tried this at work.

Got a 2410 with Chrome 1.0.154.65 on a lesser machine with other tabs open.
IE8 got 580

I don't see how this works ? ? ? Ah well

I know Chrome rules.

Quill

Small update:

Passive system (nothing else happening - single tab in browser) - (got Chrome working - Ugly but fast) firefox is pretty much the same as before. I also tried fx x64 (shiretoko 3.5.b4) with java x64 and there was no difference to my earlier post.

Mercurial

wow chrome was owning in this thread so I was curios and tested it and guess what!

theCount

Firefox is my Default Browser. I need the extensions like Web Dev toolbar, xmarks, greasemonkey , wordpress helper, FastDial etc...



on my system Safari 4 beta wins hands down...


Chrome 2 doesn�t do too bad...


Opera 9.64 performs better than FF...


Exploiter 8 is an EPIC FAIL... (as expected)


I ran the benchmark while my girlfriend was playing WoW so my results are probably inaccurate although they do reflect the "real" situation I work with...

daniel101

I dont get this,
is this good?

Mercurial

if you bench mark IE8 or other browser with in the same system you'll know the answer

Captain Zero

�� Quote: Originally Posted by daniel101

I dont get this,
is this good?

On a hunch, try lowering your refresh rate to 60Hz or something like that...

daniel101

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Captain Zero

On a hunch, try lowering your refresh rate to 60Hz or something like that...

It wont let me. the lowest it says i can go is 70Hz>>

Ronin

Not too bad.

Safari's freakin crazy, though.

Captain Zero

^^ That's a serious rig you have there, puts mine to shame. You must post pics and benches.

Mercurial

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Mercurial

wow chrome was owning in this thread so I was curios and tested it and guess what!

lol I tried it again but with the new recently released final version of google chrome 2 and wooot



its really nice especially with this crappy machine of mine lmfao

MUff1N

For me Firefox is the best & it's what I use all the time because of the extensions I can't live without now!
Fast enough for me...

tony roma

hello everybody!

this is my results...

i've never used chrome till now, but i think i'll keep it

studiorat

here i go with firefox using a hpdv9000 with 4gb ram and a amd turion x 2

Espair

Here we go, tested EI8, Opera, FF, and Chrome.

raf66

Hi all. I'm new here. I thought I would post my results as I'm not sure how to read them. It appears as if Safari 4 for Win and Chrome win out but again I'm not certain. Anyway, here goes. Thanks and I look forward to learning a lot from everyone here.









(On the Sunspider tests, Chrome is on the right side in the first and Safari is on the left side in the second).

Joshatdot

7232 x64
FF 3.5 32bit
Java 6.14 32bit

Wargollo

Great.

UP!!!

Wargollo

My Results

jav

Mine

Grimmjow

firefox - 1638 IE8 - 426

derekimo

Here's mine IE8, Firefox.

Zathras

I did pretty well with Firefox 3.5.7, on Windows 7 x64. Fairly new Core i7 system. 2876 points.

gzt7d8

Test performed with Chrome v4.0.288.1 dev on the following system specs:
Core i7 CPU 975
RAM 12.0 GB
GeForce GTX 295

Ran the same test with Firefox 3.6 RC1 and got 3915 score.

Greg

yowanvista

Firefox 3.6 RC1
Chrome 4.0.249.43

smsff7

Firefox : 2047
Chrome: 2849

Wow Chrome is that much faster?

madtownidiot

here:

Blah

Safari ran away with this one.

I still prefer Firefox to all though

DarkDavil

Here are all the browsers on my system which is Core 2 Duo 2.4 @ 4GB
i ran Chrome Dev Latest, Opera 10.5 Alpha Latest, MineField 3.7A1 Latest, Maxthon 3.XXAplha Latest, and Safari with Webkit Latest, and IE8 Latest...

Jester45

Newest Chrome.
64-bit IE.

IE = Fail

Wargollo

My new results

PC:
Athlon X2 4200+
RAM: 4GB
GeForce 8600 GT

madtownidiot

Everyone from here forward should include IE8 in their test. Hopefully word will get to someone in microsour about how much slower IE is than anything else out there and they'll do something to fix it... right.. I'll probably win a lottery first

Coolness

�� Quote: Originally Posted by madtownidiot

Everyone from here forward should include IE8 in their test. Hopefully word will get to someone in microsour about how much slower IE is than anything else out there and they'll do something to fix it... right.. I'll probably win a lottery first

LOL, yeah. Heres my awesome Opera 10.5 pre-alpha, with my crap specs. OPERA FTW

manchot

just recently switched over to chrome...

royal tyrant

heres my benchmark for ie8,complex graphics gets zulge?!

tremaine

heres my firefox

Coolness

�� Quote: Originally Posted by tremaine

heres my firefox

Attachment 50513

With those specs? Firefox is getting owned here man...

kurahk7

here are my scores with my crappy specs....

gzt7d8

Re-ran the test with the latest version of Chrome (5.0.307.1) and this test (6660) was an improvement of 300 points over the previous version.


Greg

Dark Nova Gamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by gzt7d8

Re-ran the test with the latest version of Chrome (5.0.307.1) and this test (6660) was an improvement of 300 points over the previous version.


Greg

Looks like Google Chrome feels a bit devilish on your PC.

Heres Chrome and IE on my laptop.

Attachment 51583

KazeNoKoe23

Firefox 3.6 from my netbook. 1.6 GHz Atom, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HDD.

Flopo79

here's my Chrome
my specs are kinda old /:

jfar

Here are mine, what a difference between IE and Chrome, Wow.

Jester45

Here is my iphone 3GS. OS 3.1.2 jailbroken with default springboard

Did pretty good on the first test, complex graphics killed it.

xXSevenXx

How do you you get it to do the test, as I received an error?

Uber Philf

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

How do you you get it to do the test, as I received an error?

Same with me...

xXSevenXx

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Uber Philf

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

How do you you get it to do the test, as I received an error?

Same with me...

If you don't, who does? lol

Uber Philf

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Uber Philf

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

How do you you get it to do the test, as I received an error?

Same with me...

If you don't, who does? lol

Hahah, i dunno?

Are you using the latest Chrome beta?

jfar

I just ran one and it worked.

xXSevenXx

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Uber Philf

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Uber Philf

Same with me...

If you don't, who does? lol

Hahah, i dunno?

Are you using the latest Chrome beta?

I'm using FF 3.6.

I D/L Chrome yesterday and that wouldn't work either, I think Chrome is rubbish as you have to adjust the zoom on every page so I uninstalled it.

Dark Nova Gamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Uber Philf

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

If you don't, who does? lol

Hahah, i dunno?

Are you using the latest Chrome beta?

I'm using FF 3.6.

I D/L Chrome yesterday and that wouldn't work either, I think Chrome is rubbish as you have to adjust the zoom on every page so I uninstalled it.

A lot dislike that, from what I've read on Chrome Blogs and 'reported issues', they plan to have that changed soon.

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

How do you you get it to do the test, as I received an error?

Looks like a Java issue, try uninstalling your current version(s) of Java and installing the latest. If I remember correctly, Peacekeeper uses Java.

xXSevenXx

�� Quote: Originally Posted by DarkNovaGamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Uber Philf

Hahah, i dunno?

Are you using the latest Chrome beta?

I'm using FF 3.6.

I D/L Chrome yesterday and that wouldn't work either, I think Chrome is rubbish as you have to adjust the zoom on every page so I uninstalled it.

A lot dislike that, from what I've read on Chrome Blogs and 'reported issues', they plan to have that changed soon.

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

How do you you get it to do the test, as I received an error?

Looks like a Java issue, try uninstalling your current version(s) of Java and installing the latest. If I remember correctly, Peacekeeper uses Java.

I went to java.com and It say's that I have the latest version installed.
I shall do as you suggest and report back.

xXSevenXx

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

�� Quote: Originally Posted by DarkNovaGamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

I'm using FF 3.6.

I D/L Chrome yesterday and that wouldn't work either, I think Chrome is rubbish as you have to adjust the zoom on every page so I uninstalled it.

A lot dislike that, from what I've read on Chrome Blogs and 'reported issues', they plan to have that changed soon.

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

How do you you get it to do the test, as I received an error?

Looks like a Java issue, try uninstalling your current version(s) of Java and installing the latest. If I remember correctly, Peacekeeper uses Java.

I went to java.com and It say's that I have the latest version installed.
I shall do as you suggest and report back.

I uninstalled and re-installed java, re-booted and it still don't work.
Nevermind, I shan't lose any sleep over it.

strollin

If you are still having problems running the benchmark, use the link that says "Run without system scan" which is below the big button labeled "Benchmark Your Browser".

xXSevenXx

�� Quote: Originally Posted by strollin

If you are still having problems running the benchmark, use the link that says "Run without system scan" which is below the big button labeled "Benchmark Your Browser".

Thanks for that here's the results.

Coolness

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

�� Quote: Originally Posted by strollin

If you are still having problems running the benchmark, use the link that says "Run without system scan" which is below the big button labeled "Benchmark Your Browser".

Thanks for that here's the results.

Complex grapphics and data are nice. Firefox is ok still.

xXSevenXx

Here's my latest results.
What do I need to do to improve the scores?

Dark Nova Gamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

Here's my latest results.
What do I need to do to improve the scores?

I'm fairly certain the scores received through PeaceKeeper are effected by the hardware/operating system being tested on. Unless your looking for your scores 'just to be the best' then theres no real point in you 'improving' your scores.

xXSevenXx

�� Quote: Originally Posted by DarkNovaGamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

Here's my latest results.
What do I need to do to improve the scores?

I'm fairly certain the scores received through PeaceKeeper are effected by the hardware/operating system being tested on. Unless your looking for your scores 'just to be the best' then theres no real point in you 'improving' your scores.

That makes sense. Thanks!

Coolness

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

�� Quote: Originally Posted by DarkNovaGamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

Here's my latest results.
What do I need to do to improve the scores?

I'm fairly certain the scores received through PeaceKeeper are effected by the hardware/operating system being tested on. Unless your looking for your scores 'just to be the best' then theres no real point in you 'improving' your scores.

That makes sense. Thanks!

Yeah, you can do that, or, attempt to uninstall IE, not use it, and download Opera (which you seem to have), or Chrome. Those are the fastest browsers. Safari is pretty fast too. You can also buy this machine: 48473 - Blackstorm Ultimate - Verkkokauppa.com
I know, its in Finnish, but look at the specs!

xXSevenXx

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Coolness

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

�� Quote: Originally Posted by DarkNovaGamer

I'm fairly certain the scores received through PeaceKeeper are effected by the hardware/operating system being tested on. Unless your looking for your scores 'just to be the best' then theres no real point in you 'improving' your scores.

That makes sense. Thanks!

Yeah, you can do that, or, attempt to uninstall IE, not use it, and download Opera (which you seem to have), or Chrome. Those are the fastest browsers. Safari is pretty fast too. You can also buy this machine: 48473 - Blackstorm Ultimate - Verkkokauppa.com
I know, its in Finnish, but look at the specs!

Thank God for Google, as I had it translated:
Google Translate
Very nice rig, but, I think I'll wait for 3.0 USB!
(Yes, it's outdated, even before you buy it. lol)

Dark Nova Gamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Coolness

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

That makes sense. Thanks!

Yeah, you can do that, or, attempt to uninstall IE, not use it, and download Opera (which you seem to have), or Chrome. Those are the fastest browsers. Safari is pretty fast too. You can also buy this machine: 48473 - Blackstorm Ultimate - Verkkokauppa.com
I know, its in Finnish, but look at the specs!

Thank God for Google, as I had it translated:
Google Translate
Very nice rig, but, I think I'll wait for 3.0 USB!
(Yes, it's outdated, even before you buy it. lol)

I'm personally waiting to get some money before buying anything, that and waiting for USB 3.0 to come out, since PC's with USB 2.0 will be outdated, should mean cheaper price (likely not buy much).

As for the finish thing.. thank the lord Google Chrome has a built-in translator.

xXSevenXx

�� Quote: Originally Posted by DarkNovaGamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Coolness

Yeah, you can do that, or, attempt to uninstall IE, not use it, and download Opera (which you seem to have), or Chrome. Those are the fastest browsers. Safari is pretty fast too. You can also buy this machine: 48473 - Blackstorm Ultimate - Verkkokauppa.com
I know, its in Finnish, but look at the specs!

Thank God for Google, as I had it translated:
Google Translate
Very nice rig, but, I think I'll wait for 3.0 USB!
(Yes, it's outdated, even before you buy it. lol)

I'm personally waiting to get some money before buying anything, that and waiting for USB 3.0 to come out, since PC's with USB 2.0 will be outdated, should mean cheaper price (likely not buy much).

As for the finish thing.. thank the lord Google Chrome has a built-in translator.

I wonder how much it will cost to build that rig yourself?
With the money you save you might be able to buy a mouse and keyboard etc;.lol

CarlTR6

My computer is eight years old and cobbled together; but it works!

Here are my results. For some reason it would not benchmark complex graphics in IE8. IE was pathetic.

greeman

This is from my very very old laptop, comparison of Firefox 3.6 and IE 8

Coolness

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Coolness

�� Quote: Originally Posted by xXSevenXx

That makes sense. Thanks!

Yeah, you can do that, or, attempt to uninstall IE, not use it, and download Opera (which you seem to have), or Chrome. Those are the fastest browsers. Safari is pretty fast too. You can also buy this machine: 48473 - Blackstorm Ultimate - Verkkokauppa.com
I know, its in Finnish, but look at the specs!

Thank God for Google, as I had it translated:
Google Translate
Very nice rig, but, I think I'll wait for 3.0 USB!
(Yes, it's outdated, even before you buy it. lol)

OUTDATED? WHAT? 2x 5970's is hardly outdated, its state-of-the-art! 12gigs of 1600mhz RAM, a 3,3Ghz Core i7!

TildeMerand

Here's mine, Chrome coming out on top,

TildeMerand

�� Quote: Originally Posted by CarlTR6

My computer is eight years old and cobbled together; but it works!

Here are my results. For some reason it would not benchmark complex graphics in IE8. IE was pathetic.

IE 8.0 doesn't render complex graphics.

Yea, I know. That's how /FAIL IE 8 is.

Enjoy,

Matt~

malexous

Fujitsu Siemens ESPRIMO MOBILE V5535

CarlTR6

�� Quote: Originally Posted by TildeMerand

�� Quote: Originally Posted by CarlTR6

My computer is eight years old and cobbled together; but it works!

Here are my results. For some reason it would not benchmark complex graphics in IE8. IE was pathetic.

IE 8.0 doesn't render complex graphics.

Yea, I know. That's how /FAIL IE 8 is.

Enjoy,

Matt~

Ah, thanks for the insight. I'll be sticking with FF for now.

FZ21Z

Here's mine...

Guest

Heres My Chrome & FF Benchmarks

markymark69

mmmm, not happy with these score for my IE8, i thought they would be higher than this oh well i still like it though.

ForeverZero89

the brand new opera 10.5:

rendering:3226

social net:3325

complex graphics:8033

data:4393

DOM op:3619

text parsing:5829

hybridfan

OK worth a shot....


Looks like Chrome comes up trumps.

gzt7d8

Ran the test with the latest Developer version from Chrome. Wow this is the best score that I've gotten yet.

Greg

xXSevenXx

Here's my latest scores with the latest Opera 10.50 beta

WowMike2002

Yip yip! Not too shabby if I do say so myself - Haven't tried the latest Chrome yet though, might give it a try today!

greyno3

Chrome

malexous

All are portable versions. Unknown unknown is Firefox 3.7 Alpha 2 (the only one that ran under Sandboxie).

Dark Nova Gamer

Guest

IE8 (32-bit)


IE9 Platform Preview


What..? I got bored.

swarfega

nice figures!

gzt7d8

Seems like the Chrome updates just keep improving the scores. This is my latest test with version 5.0.356.

This is a 230 point improvement, for me, over Chrome version 5.0.342.


gs

Dark Nova Gamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by gzt7d8

Seems like the Chrome updates just keep improving the scores. This is my latest test with version 5.0.356.

This is a 230 point improvement, for me, over Chrome version 5.0.342.


gs

I could be seeing things but did they add the 'Tab Preview' thing via taskbar like IE8 has in the latest dev?

Seven Eleven

9 tabs open including built-in mail and rss. plus other apps running.

gzt7d8

�� Quote: Originally Posted by DarkNovaGamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by gzt7d8

Seems like the Chrome updates just keep improving the scores. This is my latest test with version 5.0.356.

This is a 230 point improvement, for me, over Chrome version 5.0.342.


gs

I could be seeing things but did they add the 'Tab Preview' thing via taskbar like IE8 has in the latest dev?

Oh you're right, they did, great find, thanks DarkNovaGamer.

Greg

Seven Eleven

hmm... i upgraded Opera to 10.50 and now benchmark doesn't run. Error. Click for details :/

Firefox gets error too...

greyno3

WOW.. upgraded to Chrome v5.0.356.2 and it jumped up 1788 points...

gzt7d8

�� Quote: Originally Posted by greyno3

WOW.. upgraded to Chrome v5.0.356.2 and it jumped up 1788 points...

I too had a big jump between versions too;
Chrome v5.0.335 - 6506
Chrome v5.0.342 - 8289
Chrome v5.0.356 - 8520

My big jump was 335 => 342 where I saw 1783 point jump. From 335 => 356 I saw an overall increase of 2014.

Obviously, the developers optimized the code along the way.

Greg

tw33k

This is strange. These results do not reflect real world usage for me. Chrome loads web pages noticeably slower than either FF or IE

Seven Eleven

�� Quote: Originally Posted by tw33k

This is strange. These results do not reflect real world usage for me. Chrome loads web pages noticeably slower than either FF or IE

synthetic benchmarks do not reflect real world usage

tw33k

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Seven Eleven

synthetic benchmarks do not reflect real world usage

Of course they don't however, what I should have said, was that margin of difference in this benchmark is way too great. I wonder what could cause such a big discrepency. These results reflect other people's experience with Chrome but for me, it's slower than FF all round.
Looks like I have some investigating to do

Dark Nova Gamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by tw33k

This is strange. These results do not reflect real world usage for me. Chrome loads web pages noticeably slower than either FF or IE

Thats a joke, right? IE has never loaded pages faster then FireFox/Chrome for me. Also, is your Firefox 'Optimized' in any way (about:config tweaks to speed it up)? When I say Chrome is faster then Firefox, I mean with its default settings.

I shouldn't have to tweak a browser to make it faster then another.

tw33k

No tweaks at all and definately not a joke!

Dark Nova Gamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by tw33k

No tweaks at all and definately not a joke!

I suppose as I've said in the past "Different hardware, different setups, different results" but geez.

When was the last time you did a clean installation?

tw33k

�� Quote: Originally Posted by DarkNovaGamer

I suppose as I've said in the past "Different hardware, different setups, different results" but geez.

When was the last time you did a clean installation?

my system isn't even a month old. I've just been trying Chrome here at work and it's terrible. I put it and FF side-by-side and opened the same web page. FF loaded it fast, Chrome didn't load it completely at all..I got sick of waiting and closed it! My work system has nowhere near the specs as my home rig but still...

Dark Nova Gamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by tw33k

�� Quote: Originally Posted by DarkNovaGamer

I suppose as I've said in the past "Different hardware, different setups, different results" but geez.

When was the last time you did a clean installation?

my system isn't even a month old. I've just been trying Chrome here at work and it's terrible. I put it and FF side-by-side and opened the same web page. FF loaded it fast, Chrome didn't load it completely at all..I got sick of waiting and closed it! My work system has nowhere near the specs as my home rig but still...

Last question. Which version are you trying. Stable, beta or dev?

tw33k

Post your Internet Browser Benchmark

5.0.342.5

Dark Nova Gamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by tw33k

Post your Internet Browser Benchmark

5.0.342.5

Hmm. That is quite odd. I've tried it on three computers (mine, my girlfriends and my best friends, both have better specs then my own). All three Chrome was the fastest on, Firefox was a little slower and IE8 was a lot slower. (different internet speeds to)

MadMaxData

What I find odd is that I never have to wait on Internet Explorer to load....ever. So why switch to a "faster" browser?

CarlTR6

IE loads quickly at startup; it just doesn't load pages nearly as quick as FF and Chrome - at least on my machines. That can make a big difference for those with slow internet connections.

Boris

�� Quote: Originally Posted by tw33k

�� Quote: Originally Posted by DarkNovaGamer

I suppose as I've said in the past "Different hardware, different setups, different results" but geez.

When was the last time you did a clean installation?

my system isn't even a month old. I've just been trying Chrome here at work and it's terrible. I put it and FF side-by-side and opened the same web page. FF loaded it fast, Chrome didn't load it completely at all..I got sick of waiting and closed it! My work system has nowhere near the specs as my home rig but still...

Perhaps your workplace has some restrictions, which limit chrome. Have you tested both side by side at home?

MadMaxData

�� Quote: Originally Posted by CarlTR6

IE loads quickly at startup; it just doesn't load pages nearly as quick as FF and Chrome - at least on my machines. That can make a big difference for those with slow internet connections.

I've got cable hookup, so you could be right. Have you ever tried running IE without ActiveX enabled?

Boris

My opera 10.51 score: 5884 (@work)

CarlTR6

No, I haven't. I don't use IE except for MS sites and even then, I usually use FF with IE Tab. Back when I was living in the boondocks (five years ago) neither cable nor ADSL were available. All I had was dialup. I switched to FF because IE was so slow to render pages. Since then, I have used FF. Now that I have ADSL, the speed issue is not as important; but even with ADSL, FF, Chrome, and Opera are much faster at rendering most pages than IE8. And this new browser, Lunascape, is even faster. It is a pretty cool browser. Kari turned me on to it.

MadMaxData

Yeah, me too. I downloaded it yesterday. However, I'm just going to use it when I need to check my JavaScript codes for browser compatibility. I love my IE8. The only time I didn't care for IE was when popups first started coming out [God I feel old]. IE would get uncontrolable popups, and open up more windows than you could close. But they fixed that shortly afterward. I guess I'm the only die-hard IE guy around. I never cared for Firefox, I think it looks like a kiddy browser.

Boris

Lunascape looks very practical, but is not the way forward. In an ideal world browsers should adhere to web standards...

CarlTR6

Agreed; but unfortunately, we are not in an ideal world.

gzt7d8

New version of Chrome Dev 5.0.360, gave me another big boost of around 700 points from 8520 to 9241.


Greg

Edit: Tested Chrome Dev 5.0.366 was another boost; 9691

stve

Heres the scores for the Browsers on my PC.

stve

Just added the latest Chrome Beta & the Lunascape browser & ran the test again.

Firestrider

Chrome 5.0.366.2 vs. Firefox 3.7a4 vs. Opera 10.51 vs. IE9:

I wonder what code Social networking tests... this is where Chrome needs improvement. Also some tips from Opera on rendering

stve

Just ran the test again using Opera 10.52 portable.

Dave76

Only use IE on some MS sites.

After I got Chrome, FF and Opera just weren't getting used, so finally let them go.

It's all personal preference, none are better than others, it's what you like and feel comfortable with. Well, except for IE, it's just slow.

Corrine

Guess I'll stick with FF.

Dave76

Geeezzz Corrine, 1707, are you OK with that?

si8mon

Chrome Opera Firefox Internet Explorer

Corrine

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Dave76

Geeezzz Corrine, 1707, are you OK with that?

A second computer benchmarked at 2555 Points for Firefox. I didn't pay much attention to the results, merely gave a shot to "play along". As long as I can get to the forums and the pages load quickly with my lite broadband connection, I'm happy.

xXSevenXx

Latest results.

Dave76

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Corrine

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Dave76

Geeezzz Corrine, 1707, are you OK with that?

A second computer benchmarked at 2555 Points for Firefox. I didn't pay much attention to the results, merely gave a shot to "play along". As long as I can get to the forums and the pages load quickly with my lite broadband connection, I'm happy.

That's a better score, as long as it's doing what you need.

I'm severely broadband limited as well. Slow connection

Snowdog

Not that it matters that much. According to this my Chrome install is twice as fast as my Firefox, but I can see no real world difference between them and I use Firefox as my browsers.

Firestrider

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Snowdog

Not that it matters that much. According to this my Chrome install is twice as fast as my Firefox, but I can see no real world difference between them and I use Firefox as my browsers.

Yeah you won't see much of a difference if you don't use web applications heavy in JavaScript / HTML5. In some areas Chrome is a lot faster than IE/FF.

It's kind of hard to measure performance on the web because of the broad composition of code in different web sites plus factoring in network bandwidth / latency.

G4b1t

2 Browsers.
Chrome 32bit vs. IE64bit.

CarlTR6

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Firestrider

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Snowdog

Not that it matters that much. According to this my Chrome install is twice as fast as my Firefox, but I can see no real world difference between them and I use Firefox as my browsers.

Yeah you won't see much of a difference if you don't use web applications heavy in JavaScript / HTML5. In some areas Chrome is a lot faster than IE/FF.

It's kind of hard to measure performance on the web because of the broad composition of code in different web sites plus factoring in network bandwidth / latency.

You are right. The benchmarks are really potential. Between variations in bandwidth and variations in coding, I don't see any difference in FF and Chrome speed wise - except Chrome loads faster initially. There is not enough difference to lead me to change to Chrome. I have no trouble the difference in speed with IE.

Firestrider

Chrome scores 1000 more points on Linux?



My previous score is on the last page.

stve

Quote:

Chrome scores 1000 more points on Linux?
My previous score is on the last page.

Your previous score was windows 7 ? and Chrome is faster in Linux thats impressive.

Dark Nova Gamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Firestrider

Chrome scores 1000 more points on Linux?

Attachment 67110

My previous score is on the last page.

Are you using the 64-bit Chrome on Linux?

Thenight

mine with Chrome 5

Firestrider

�� Quote: Originally Posted by DarkNovaGamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Firestrider

Chrome scores 1000 more points on Linux?

Attachment 67110

My previous score is on the last page.

Are you using the 64-bit Chrome on Linux?

I'm not sure. I downloaded the one for 64-bit Linux systems: google-chrome-unstable_current_amd64.deb

But I'm not sure if the process is 64-bit or how to check that in Linux.

Dark Nova Gamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Firestrider

�� Quote: Originally Posted by DarkNovaGamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Firestrider

Chrome scores 1000 more points on Linux?

Attachment 67110

My previous score is on the last page.

Are you using the 64-bit Chrome on Linux?

I'm not sure. I downloaded the one for 64-bit Linux systems: google-chrome-unstable_current_amd64.deb

But I'm not sure if the process is 64-bit or how to check that in Linux.

Thats a true 64-bit Browser then. Which also has a 64-bit flash for it (lucky linux).

As far as I know, 64-bit linux operating systems cannot use 32-bit linux applications. Not an expert though so I could be wrong but try to install anything i386 and it will deny it.

kurahk7

opera 10.51 ftw, using it right now

stve

Here's my scores comparing Opera 10.51 against the current Chrome release & the latest Chrome Beta release.
I'm using the portable version of Opera.

xXSevenXx

Latest version of Chrome!!

stve

I have just installed & benchmarked the Wyzo browser which is based on Firefox my PC seems slower today Opera seems to have slowed down by about 10% while Chrome is about 50% slower.
After running the Peacekeeper test on Wyzo & closing the browser I noticed there was a process left open by Wyzo (FF3.5.6) & it was still consuming 103 MB. Wyzo has several extensions added by default which may be slowing it down ?

Snowdog

�� Quote: Originally Posted by stve

I have just installed & benchmarked the Wyzo browser which is based on Firefox my PC seems slower today Opera seems to have slowed down by about 10% while Chrome is about 50% slower.

IMO peacekeeper is flawed. I was testing IE8 32bit vs 64 bit and noticed that my IE8 32 score had dropped from ~1050 to ~850. I scoured my PC of anything running to zero effect. A little while later I ran it again and it was back up to ~1050.

I did notice that during the lower score times, I was also having slow access to the peacekeeper page.

It definitely seems like a flaky benchmark. Sunspider might be more consistent.

But benchmarking browsers is a largely pointless activity. A browser being even 2 or 3 times faster doesn't actually result in a better browsing experience, because the bottleneck is not in rendering, it is in getting pages off the net.

Firestrider

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Snowdog

�� Quote: Originally Posted by stve

I have just installed & benchmarked the Wyzo browser which is based on Firefox my PC seems slower today Opera seems to have slowed down by about 10% while Chrome is about 50% slower.

IMO peacekeeper is flawed. I was testing IE8 32bit vs 64 bit and noticed that my IE8 32 score had dropped from ~1050 to ~850. I scoured my PC of anything running to zero effect. A little while later I ran it again and it was back up to ~1050.

I did notice that during the lower score times, I was also having slow access to the peacekeeper page.

It definitely seems like a flaky benchmark. Sunspider might be more consistent.

But benchmarking browsers is a largely pointless activity. A browser being even 2 or 3 times faster doesn't actually result in a better browsing experience, because the bottleneck is not in rendering, it is in getting pages off the net.

That latest sunspider is good but it only measures a subset of Javascript performance.

Dromaeo is better because it tests the DOM and some CSS selectors along with Javascript but doesn't test HTML5.

Slickspeed is a comprehensive benchmark for CSS selector framework speed.

There's no real good test for HTML5 canvas besides Peacekeeper. Maybe c5bench but it says its only for smartphones.

You are right that network download time (even if we had Google gigabit fiber) is still the dominant bottleneck in web performance but it is still good to improve in other subsystems.

Snowdog

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Firestrider

There's no real good test for HTML5 canvas besides Peacekeeper. Maybe c5bench but it says its only for smartphones.

Then maybe use Peacekeeper just for the Canvas bench and note that it isn't even included in the final score since some browsers don't support it (IE).

And also note that Peacekeeper does have issues with ~20% margin of error.

eldinv

is this good?

stve

Just tested the latest betas from Chrome & Opera very close, remember Chrome 5 & Opera 10.52 are betas Chrome edges it but the Opera scores are more evenly spread.
I remembered i can tile the tabs in Opera makes it simpler if you want to show the details as well.

kurahk7

�� Quote: Originally Posted by eldinv

is this good?

Your score seems kinda low, I used to have an AMD Athlon 64 x2 6000+ (same as yours), and the scores were a bit higher O_O

Techguystu

i think mine was good for chrome

xXSevenXx

�� Quote: Originally Posted by stve

Just tested the latest betas from Chrome & Opera very close, remember Chrome 5 & Opera 10.52 are betas Chrome edges it but the Opera scores are more evenly spread.
I remembered i can tile the tabs in Opera makes it simpler if you want to show the details as well.

Wil you please fill in your system specs, as I'm looking for ideas for a new build.
Thanks.

stve

Done.

stve

�� Quote: Originally Posted by Snowdog

�� Quote: Originally Posted by stve

I have just installed & benchmarked the Wyzo browser which is based on Firefox my PC seems slower today Opera seems to have slowed down by about 10% while Chrome is about 50% slower.

IMO peacekeeper is flawed. I was testing IE8 32bit vs 64 bit and noticed that my IE8 32 score had dropped from ~1050 to ~850. I scoured my PC of anything running to zero effect. A little while later I ran it again and it was back up to ~1050.

I did notice that during the lower score times, I was also having slow access to the peacekeeper page.

It definitely seems like a flaky benchmark. Sunspider might be more consistent.

But benchmarking browsers is a largely pointless activity. A browser being even 2 or 3 times faster doesn't actually result in a better browsing experience, because the bottleneck is not in rendering, it is in getting pages off the net.

Peacekeeper benchmarks do seem to vary depending on what time of day you do them but if you do do different browsers under the same conditions the relative performance seems OK.

All the browsers are fast enough with my 10MB broadband even IE 8 , if the internet connection is slow or i am being throttled (capped) by my broadband provider the turbo mode in Opera will make it the fastest but if you forget to turn it off when your connection speed improves Opera will then be the slowest browser.
What the Peacekeeper test does not show is how fast Opera is when you use the back or forwards buttons that is noticeable.
IE 8 is fast enough for most sites but is pretty useless on sites like Chromium Experiments.
The User Interface of a browser is where you can gain speed the slowest part of my system is the human keyboard operator so has your browser got good keyboard shortcuts mouse gestures etc...

stve

Opera has released 10.53 a stability & security fix. I benchmarked it against Chome which for some unknown reason was running very slowly so I installed a newer version & that was even slower. Opera & Firefox were unaffected.

Devon

Doesn't seem to me that opera's the world's fastest browser.

fatedquest

Some browsers you don't see often on Windows 7 64 bit running on a mobile processor.

stve

@ Devon not on your PC but the fastest system on Peacekeeper using Opera 10.52 scored 14274 so if any browser can lay claim to being the fastest it's Opera .
Just tested the latest 10.54 beta from Opera & its very fast while Chrome at least on my PC has slowed to a crawl.

Two weeks ago Chrome 5.0.375.17 beta scored 11252 on my PC see page 15 of this thread post 148.
Since then on my PC Chrome has been running very slowly especially on the rendering tests installing the latest Chrome beta tonight it's the same story everything else on my PC is running fast browsing with Chrome feels as fast as ever it's only running the Peacekeeper test it seems slow especially the bouncing balls, no idea why.

severedsolo

epic fail for IE

Lanthus20

Wow im looking at some of these and going, "How do you survive with internet that slow?!"

xXSevenXx

These browsers seem to be going backwards instead of forwards.

A Guy

Wow, you guys get great Opera scores







A Guy

firefox2010

This Peacekeeper browser test is so crap. If I test with Opera while keep browsing, I get 20% higher point than normal.

pasquanel

Opera 10.54

works for me and no plugins

steve-pressman

Chrome works for me 5.0.357.38 Beta


Steve

gpm97457

here are my benchmark results for the following browsers.

Smiggwiler

I got 3600 with Chrome ^_^.
Really good I reckon.

xXSevenXx

Here we go.

SinRival

Pretty Happy With This As I didn't expect great scores as my netbook couldn't produce much, but with Chrome 5 build, latest

1125

Happy!

Chrome has two extentions on it, one for youtube and the other for adblocker

Edit:

Also, I laughed,

Internet Explorer 8 ran right now.. and well 211 LOL!

IE8 failz... 0_0

stve

Opera 10.6 alpha is pretty fast

stve

Its funny but every time i do a fresh install of Opera the first benchmark run with Peacekeeper is always the highest no idea why .

stve

Heres mine,

Opera running inside greenborder( its a type of sandbox) on XP running in virtualbox on windows 7. For my system specs i think its ok.

Attachment 76578

blackroseMD1

Chrome has been running very slow on my PC for the last 5 weeks but now Chrome 5 is the stable version installing it seems to have fixed the problems.
I've benchmarked the latest chrome & Opera stable & Dev releases.

jebuchanan

Chrome 6.0.422.0 Dev

Dark Nova Gamer

My results with IE8 and Chrome:

blackroseMD1

Went a little crazy with PeaceKeeper.

stve

�� Quote: Originally Posted by DarkNovaGamer

Went a little crazy with PeaceKeeper.

Attachment 77333

Where did you get 6.0.428.0 from? I'm still stuck on 6.0.422.0

Dark Nova Gamer

@ DarkNovaGamer
Next to Safari unknown it says Maxthon, i thought Maxthon was based on IE ?

Elmer BeFuddled

�� Quote: Originally Posted by blackroseMD1

�� Quote: Originally Posted by DarkNovaGamer

Went a little crazy with PeaceKeeper.

Attachment 77333

Where did you get 6.0.428.0 from? I'm still stuck on 6.0.422.0

It is a nightly build of Chromium.
Index of /buildbot/snapshots/chromium-rel-xp

Scroll down to the very last folder, no auto update ability for nightlies so manual updates only (meaning downloading the mini_installer.exe and running it to overright the current installed nightly).

Can be installed alongside Chrome/Chromium (Beta/Dev).

�� Quote: Originally Posted by stve

@ DarkNovaGamer
Next to Safari unknown it says Maxthon, i thought Maxthon was based on IE ?

No clue. I put Maxthon beside it because thats what I used for that one.

blackroseMD1

I was going to compare Firefox with I.E.8

But it couldn't..... CONNECT !!!!!
Elmer BeFuddled

Guest

�� Quote: Originally Posted by DarkNovaGamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by blackroseMD1

�� Quote: Originally Posted by DarkNovaGamer

Went a little crazy with PeaceKeeper.

Attachment 77333

Where did you get 6.0.428.0 from? I'm still stuck on 6.0.422.0

It is a nightly build of Chromium.
Index of /buildbot/snapshots/chromium-rel-xp

Scroll down to the very last folder, no auto update ability for nightlies so manual updates only (meaning downloading the mini_installer.exe and running it to overright the current installed nightly).

Can be installed alongside Chrome/Chromium (Beta/Dev).

�� Quote: Originally Posted by stve

@ DarkNovaGamer
Next to Safari unknown it says Maxthon, i thought Maxthon was based on IE ?

No clue. I put Maxthon beside it because thats what I used for that one.

Awesome. Thanks DNG.

stve

Apple say Safari is "The world�s fastest browser, Safari has speed to burn"
I don't know what weed they've been smoking but its not that fast on my PC.

About Maxthon it's Chinese & based on IE it has a menu button like Opera paste & go & mouse gestures very few options to configure it.

"GPU rendering will used in conjunction with Webkit, one of two code sets that make up Maxthon 3.0�s hybrid rendering engine. The engine translates a Web�s page�s HTML code into text and graphics displayed on the PC�s screen. The other code set is Trident, used to optimize older Web pages written for Internet Explorer�s vintage display standards. Maxthon�s rendering engine switches automatically between the two code interpreters depending on the type of Web page the browser is opening."

Safari unknown & Internet Explorer 7 are both Maxthon 3.0.11.8

I've also tested Firefox 3.6.4 release candidate.

MK2

My result with the latest chrome:

blackroseMD1

With the latest (I think) nightly of Chromium 6.0.432.0 (49413)

Dark Nova Gamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by blackroseMD1

With the latest (I think) nightly of Chromium 6.0.432.0 (49413)

Read this thread's first post; Chrome/Chromium hardware acceleration - Neowin Forums

blackroseMD1

�� Quote: Originally Posted by DarkNovaGamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by blackroseMD1

With the latest (I think) nightly of Chromium 6.0.432.0 (49413)

Read this thread's first post; Chrome/Chromium hardware acceleration - Neowin Forums

That is freakin' awesome! Thanks for the heads up DNG.

stve

Chrome is fast again on my PC but opening 23 tabs in both Opera was a lot quicker.
I like the way you can just drag & drop a bookmark folder into Chrome from another browser , pretty cool i hope Opera adds that feature.

Firestrider

�� Quote: Originally Posted by DarkNovaGamer

�� Quote: Originally Posted by blackroseMD1

With the latest (I think) nightly of Chromium 6.0.432.0 (49413)

Read this thread's first post; Chrome/Chromium hardware acceleration - Neowin Forums

Here is a post from a Chromium developer:

Quote:

Comment 24 by vange...@chromium.org, Jun 07 (3 days ago)
@divilex, gpu acceleration for chromium is already in the works! As a matter of fact, our OpenGL-based gpu compositor is pretty complete although currently sitting behind a compile-time flag. I'm working on making it available as a command-line option within the next day or so. Please stay tuned.

@phistuck is right that a lot of even fairly new windows PCs out there don't have up-to-date OpenGL drivers. That's why we started the ANGLE project and are now working on integrating it with Chromium.

Looks like we will need up to date OpenGL drivers on Windows though. If there are no OpenGL drivers for your graphics card under Windows then you have to use this: angleproject - Project Hosting on Google Code which I believe translates DirectX calls to OpenGL.


I'm glad Google will use a OpenGL-based compositor instead of DirectX, so we can get GPU-accelerated rendering on any Linux platform including Chrome on Android for Google TV, and Mac OS X.

tw33k

At work...

blackroseMD1

Dang, still haven't cracked 10K. Chromium 6.0.432.0 (49506) This is with both GPU rendering and video layering enabled.

awaisdell

well for me.... i use 2 browsers...
firefox for all browsing and chrome for social sites....n these 2 rock.....
never liked IE, opera (dun know :P), safari (very heavy), maxthon (too messy), flock (once used,never liked again) etc...

stve

Quote:

Read this thread's first post; Chrome/Chromium hardware acceleration - Neowin Forums

"Accelerated Graphics, totally absent from Web world, are now opening up for direct GPU access offloading CPU further. A new venture that includes Mozilla, Google, and Opera Software � along with graphics processor leaders AMD (ATI) and Nvidia, announced this morning their intention to produce a royalty-free mechanism for producing hardware-assisted 3D graphics using JavaScript-enabled Web pages, for initial distribution during the first half of next year."
GPU Accelerated Web Graphics � NVIDIA, AMD, Google, Mozilla, Opera

Seven Eleven

�� Quote: Originally Posted by stve

"Accelerated Graphics, totally absent from Web world, are now opening up for direct GPU access offloading CPU further. A new venture that includes Mozilla, Google, and Opera Software � along with graphics processor leaders AMD (ATI) and Nvidia, announced this morning their intention to produce a royalty-free mechanism for producing hardware-assisted 3D graphics using JavaScript-enabled Web pages, for initial distribution during the first half of next year."
GPU Accelerated Web Graphics � NVIDIA, AMD, Google, Mozilla, Opera

awesome news! no more cpu fan spinning like mad when Firefox is displaying simple page with many youtube videos!

ebarn

Tested:
Chrome 5.0.375.70
FF 3.6.3 x64
IE 8.0 c64 (shameful)

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

porkr

Chipset Type Mobile Intel GM45 Express
Data Bus Speed 1066 MHz
64-bit Computing Yes
Multi-Core Technology Dual-Core
Processor Intel Core 2 Duo T9600 / 2.8 GHz
Windows 7 64 bit


CHROME screams !

blackroseMD1

Chrome 6.0.440.0 (50024), Minefield 3.7a5pre, IE 8

Phil Eus

The Benchmark To Beat



The challenge has been set!!!!



Aah!! That's Better!!

manusdn7

my firefox benchmark

valentyn666

And my score

kurahk7

Opera 10.6 Final, just released

A Guy

A Guy