Just ran a bench mark on my card and was wondering if any experts can tell me if the results are ok.
Steve
Steve
Steve,
I'm not too sure why you chose 1274x966 res, 1024x768 is a standard res and most games will run full screen using it, other than that the score is commensurate with an ATi HD5770 a very capable GPU.
I'm not too sure why you chose 1274x966 res, 1024x768 is a standard res and most games will run full screen using it, other than that the score is commensurate with an ATi HD5770 a very capable GPU.
Oh I didn't know it wast'n it full screen 
I have redone it again any difference ?
Steve
I have redone it again any difference ?
Steve
Heck yes!
I was going to say let's trade but then...


I think I'm doing okay.
Nice card though, Steve.
I think I'm doing okay.
Nice card though, Steve.
set res to 1680x1050 8AA and 16AF run it full screen and post results , i can then compare them to results i have give you an idea of how fast your rig ias compared to mine 
at those settings you have there your gpu isnt doing any work at all , its like your telling it to walk down hill
...... stress it out a bit
at those settings you have there your gpu isnt doing any work at all , its like your telling it to walk down hill
Hi Archie it wont let me run at full screen at these 1680x1050 I have no idea why 
Steve

Steve
i see why mate , your max monitor res is 1280x1024 , you absolutely need a new monitor for that rig , you should be gaming at 1920x1200 AT LEAST with that
that rig is wasted on that screen mate
get a better monitor (im assuming as you bought a prebuilt overclocked rig from overclockers your not short of a few bob) 
that card and that cpu will easily stand a 24" monitor get a decent one and you'll wondewr how the hell you managed for so long gaming at such a low res
here you go

http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showpr...id=510&subcat=
EDIT..................im getting that card confused with the card i used to have the 5870 , maybe im being a little ambitious with the res , stick to 22" 1680x1050
http://alienbabeltech.com/main/?p=12436&page=4
that rig is wasted on that screen mate
that card and that cpu will easily stand a 24" monitor get a decent one and you'll wondewr how the hell you managed for so long gaming at such a low res
here you go
http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showpr...id=510&subcat=
EDIT..................im getting that card confused with the card i used to have the 5870 , maybe im being a little ambitious with the res , stick to 22" 1680x1050
http://alienbabeltech.com/main/?p=12436&page=4
I'll send an E-mail to Santa this year and see what he brings
But nice to know the possibility's i have for the future 
Steve
Steve
my kombuster
Intersting benchmark.
Guess my 4890 is hanging in there
Done 1 at the default 1280x1024 res and a second at 1920x1080P.
Not too bad I think .. just wish it had DX11
Guess my 4890 is hanging in there
Done 1 at the default 1280x1024 res and a second at 1920x1080P.
Not too bad I think .. just wish it had DX11

I'm wondering why you're using the ATI drivers so outdated. Did you had any problems with the newer versions?! If not, I suggest that you update them, since it is quite likely that you'll get better results with more accurate drivers!
They can be found here: http://www.sevenforums.com/graphic-c...ndows-7-a.html
I am kind of old school and a believer of "If it ain't broken don't fix it" However I will make a fresh system image in a few minutes and then download the new drivers and see what difference I get. Thanks for the info 
Steve
Steve
I am kind of old school and a believer of "If it ain't broken don't fix it" However I will make a fresh system image in a few minutes and then download the new drivers and see what difference I get. Thanks for the info 
Steve
Steve
steve,
Try it with 10.3 and then 10.6 but skip both 10.4 and 10.5 they were a bit buggy, my laptop is very happy with 10.3 and my desktop 10.6.
Try it with 10.3 and then 10.6 but skip both 10.4 and 10.5 they were a bit buggy, my laptop is very happy with 10.3 and my desktop 10.6.
Could only find the 10.7
I will try them anyways I can always go back to my old image if they are buggy.
Steve
Steve
can someone post me the link to that program he is using or attach it for me so i can test my card i have the same one interested in how it benches on oc mode
I been using trail versions of pc vantage benchmark ect not really giving me the performance info i really want
thanks in advance if someone happens to have a kind heart and send
I been using trail versions of pc vantage benchmark ect not really giving me the performance info i really want
thanks in advance if someone happens to have a kind heart and send
yeah you are kinda doing your 5770 a injustice by not allowing it to give true power on the screen belive me after building this rig i seen a hell of a big difference especially when i was using my 7300gt on a 22" now using the hd 5770 im like man where in the hell have i been all this time
belive me you will be wowed after a new fresh hdmi flatscreeen
belive me you will be wowed after a new fresh hdmi flatscreeen
Thanks i will have to DL after i get off work tonight Im at my folks house getting ready also using there old e machines wow can't wait to get home to my beauty
sweet Thanks again wallonn you once again proved why you are a crucial part of this forum
Well I uninstalled the drivers and installed the 10.7 but had nothing but problems with them
SO I went to the Asus site and downloaded there latest drivers and everything seems back to normal now and here are my test results.
Steve

Steve
Well I uninstalled the drivers and installed the 10.7 but had nothing but problems with them
SO I went to the Asus site and downloaded there latest drivers and everything seems back to normal now and here are my test results.
Steve

Steve
It's a shame that you have found nothing but trouble ... I always keep my drivers updated and the only time I had problems was with version 2.49 of the Realtek HD Audio, with which I could not activate the Dolby Home Theater. It seems that what prevailed was your maximum - "If it ain't broken don't fix it" -, my friend!
Try here Steve:
SAPPHIRE- HOME
This is Sapphires site for ATI cards, usually where I grab my drivers.
I do not believe being a different brand should matter, as its all the same ATI CCC, But, they always keep older CCC's as well as the new ones.
Back as far as 9.11 ATM.
SAPPHIRE- HOME
This is Sapphires site for ATI cards, usually where I grab my drivers.
I do not believe being a different brand should matter, as its all the same ATI CCC, But, they always keep older CCC's as well as the new ones.
Back as far as 9.11 ATM.
OUCH tried the drivers from Asus and ended up getting BSOD every couple of minutes
SO that sucked! I am glad I made an image of my system thats was running perfectly, restored it back to the image and now all is running sooooooooooooooo sweet again now.
Like I said earlier "If it ain't broken don't fix it" It doesn't really matter as I am not a gamer so I don't need to squeeze anything more out of my Graphic's Card.
Steve

Like I said earlier "If it ain't broken don't fix it" It doesn't really matter as I am not a gamer so I don't need to squeeze anything more out of my Graphic's Card.
Steve
i see why mate , your max monitor res is 1280x1024 , you absolutely need a new monitor for that rig , you should be gaming at 1920x1200 AT LEAST with that
that rig is wasted on that screen mate
get a better monitor (im assuming as you bought a prebuilt overclocked rig from overclockers your not short of a few bob) 
that card and that cpu will easily stand a 24" monitor get a decent one and you'll wondewr how the hell you managed for so long gaming at such a low res
here you go

Dell UltraSharp U2410 24" Widescreen LCD Monitor - Midnight Grey [860-10089] 24" LCD
EDIT..................im getting that card confused with the card i used to have the 5870 , maybe im being a little ambitious with the res , stick to 22" 1680x1050
ATi Radeon 5770 Performance Test | AlienBabelTech
that rig is wasted on that screen mate
that card and that cpu will easily stand a 24" monitor get a decent one and you'll wondewr how the hell you managed for so long gaming at such a low res
here you go
Dell UltraSharp U2410 24" Widescreen LCD Monitor - Midnight Grey [860-10089] 24" LCD
EDIT..................im getting that card confused with the card i used to have the 5870 , maybe im being a little ambitious with the res , stick to 22" 1680x1050
ATi Radeon 5770 Performance Test | AlienBabelTech
Well I uninstalled the drivers and installed the 10.7 but had nothing but problems with them
SO I went to the Asus site and downloaded there latest drivers and everything seems back to normal now and here are my test results.
Steve

Steve
i see why mate , your max monitor res is 1280x1024 , you absolutely need a new monitor for that rig , you should be gaming at 1920x1200 AT LEAST with that
that rig is wasted on that screen mate
get a better monitor (im assuming as you bought a prebuilt overclocked rig from overclockers your not short of a few bob) 
that card and that cpu will easily stand a 24" monitor get a decent one and you'll wondewr how the hell you managed for so long gaming at such a low res
here you go

Dell UltraSharp U2410 24" Widescreen LCD Monitor - Midnight Grey [860-10089] 24" LCD
EDIT..................im getting that card confused with the card i used to have the 5870 , maybe im being a little ambitious with the res , stick to 22" 1680x1050
ATi Radeon 5770 Performance Test | AlienBabelTech
that rig is wasted on that screen mate
that card and that cpu will easily stand a 24" monitor get a decent one and you'll wondewr how the hell you managed for so long gaming at such a low res
here you go
Dell UltraSharp U2410 24" Widescreen LCD Monitor - Midnight Grey [860-10089] 24" LCD
EDIT..................im getting that card confused with the card i used to have the 5870 , maybe im being a little ambitious with the res , stick to 22" 1680x1050
ATi Radeon 5770 Performance Test | AlienBabelTech
My Kombuster
Ok you have me concerned now I have just redone the test again using other software here are the results I will try with 3Dmark Vantage as soon as it has finished downloading and post results.
Steve
Steve
those scores are ok mate i think , look at wishmasters scores , his card though older is quite a bit faster than yours , looking into benchmarks i think your card is performing ok , its no powerhouse but more than enough 
i was mainly concerned with yuor furmark score it does seem very low
it might be worth getting 3d mark vantage or 3d mark 06 and running it at its default settings , you can compare your score to others with similar rigs on the 3d mark site
look at my komster score , last post previous page just so you can see how much variation you can get between cards , it doesnt mean yours is faulty
i was mainly concerned with yuor furmark score it does seem very low
it might be worth getting 3d mark vantage or 3d mark 06 and running it at its default settings , you can compare your score to others with similar rigs on the 3d mark site
look at my komster score , last post previous page just so you can see how much variation you can get between cards , it doesnt mean yours is faulty
i see why mate , your max monitor res is 1280x1024 , you absolutely need a new monitor for that rig , you should be gaming at 1920x1200 AT LEAST with that
that rig is wasted on that screen mate
get a better monitor (im assuming as you bought a prebuilt overclocked rig from overclockers your not short of a few bob) 
that card and that cpu will easily stand a 24" monitor get a decent one and you'll wondewr how the hell you managed for so long gaming at such a low res
here you go

Dell UltraSharp U2410 24" Widescreen LCD Monitor - Midnight Grey [860-10089] 24" LCD
EDIT..................im getting that card confused with the card i used to have the 5870 , maybe im being a little ambitious with the res , stick to 22" 1680x1050
ATi Radeon 5770 Performance Test | AlienBabelTech
that rig is wasted on that screen mate
that card and that cpu will easily stand a 24" monitor get a decent one and you'll wondewr how the hell you managed for so long gaming at such a low res
here you go
Dell UltraSharp U2410 24" Widescreen LCD Monitor - Midnight Grey [860-10089] 24" LCD
EDIT..................im getting that card confused with the card i used to have the 5870 , maybe im being a little ambitious with the res , stick to 22" 1680x1050
ATi Radeon 5770 Performance Test | AlienBabelTech
My Kombuster
nah , not crysis on high , not at that res.....im not avin that it'll be a sub 20fps slideshow and as for BC2 you must be looking at 25-30 fps especially on Africa Harbour 
http://alienbabeltech.com/main/?p=12436&page=4
http://alienbabeltech.com/main/?p=12436&page=4
who wants to see my ABYSMAL score?!
erm............we do
nah , not crysis on high , not at that res.....im not avin that it'll be a sub 20fps slideshow and as for BC2 you must be looking at 25-30 fps especially on Africa Harbour 
ATi Radeon 5770 Performance Test | AlienBabelTech
ATi Radeon 5770 Performance Test | AlienBabelTech
As for your results, it takes my two cards running in Crossfire to equal yours. I'm so jealous.
well since ONE GUY asked for it i will post it
, tho i will use the same as everyone else to show how bad it is
I think you should download a more recent version of Kombustor from the MSI website. Mine is a build from June and it sees my cards properly, the earlier versions gave lousy results similar to yours. It just didn't work right. IIRC, a 3850 shouldn't perform that badly.
ok new test says you are right, will post 4 test results
also the newer test seems that the MSI itself seems to have less graphically intense fur to it



also the newer test seems that the MSI itself seems to have less graphically intense fur to it
That's a bit more like it.
I hate you all after seeing my score, no further comment. 
But seriously, good to see a huge improvement over mine with newer CPUs.
But seriously, good to see a huge improvement over mine with newer CPUs.
..or am I doing something wrong?
...or is 10.7 that much better?
I am still using 10.4, due to post 10.4 bug that makes one program unuseable otherwise.
I did run the test for 2 mins instead of one:
Is that for any mobo/video card testing?
It thinks my 7 HP is Server? and can't tell what my clocks are... ouch...
...or is 10.7 that much better?
I am still using 10.4, due to post 10.4 bug that makes one program unuseable otherwise.
I did run the test for 2 mins instead of one:
Is that for any mobo/video card testing?
It thinks my 7 HP is Server? and can't tell what my clocks are... ouch...
You're using a pretty old version of Kombustor. See Smarteyeball's link at the top of this page for the newest version. It runs a lot better, and it can see your clocks, and detect Windows properly..
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét